Disentangling the abiotic and biotic components of AMF suppressive soils

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Disentangling the abiotic and biotic components of AMF suppressive soils. / Cruz-Paredes, Carla; Diera, Tomas; Davey, Marie; Rieckmann, Maria Monrad; Christensen, Peter; Dela Cruz, Majbrit; Laursen, Kristian Holst; Joner, Erik J.; Christensen, Jan H.; Nybroe, Ole; Jakobsen, Iver.

In: Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Vol. 159, 108305, 2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Cruz-Paredes, C, Diera, T, Davey, M, Rieckmann, MM, Christensen, P, Dela Cruz, M, Laursen, KH, Joner, EJ, Christensen, JH, Nybroe, O & Jakobsen, I 2021, 'Disentangling the abiotic and biotic components of AMF suppressive soils', Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 159, 108305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108305

APA

Cruz-Paredes, C., Diera, T., Davey, M., Rieckmann, M. M., Christensen, P., Dela Cruz, M., Laursen, K. H., Joner, E. J., Christensen, J. H., Nybroe, O., & Jakobsen, I. (2021). Disentangling the abiotic and biotic components of AMF suppressive soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 159, [108305]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108305

Vancouver

Cruz-Paredes C, Diera T, Davey M, Rieckmann MM, Christensen P, Dela Cruz M et al. Disentangling the abiotic and biotic components of AMF suppressive soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2021;159. 108305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108305

Author

Cruz-Paredes, Carla ; Diera, Tomas ; Davey, Marie ; Rieckmann, Maria Monrad ; Christensen, Peter ; Dela Cruz, Majbrit ; Laursen, Kristian Holst ; Joner, Erik J. ; Christensen, Jan H. ; Nybroe, Ole ; Jakobsen, Iver. / Disentangling the abiotic and biotic components of AMF suppressive soils. In: Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2021 ; Vol. 159.

Bibtex

@article{aa6111f3183445be8e4019a145efbd2c,
title = "Disentangling the abiotic and biotic components of AMF suppressive soils",
abstract = "Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are important in plant nutrient uptake, but their function is prone to environmental constraints including soil factors that may suppress AMF transfer of phosphorus (P) from the soil to the plant. The objective of this study was to disentangle the biotic and abiotic components of AMF-suppressive soils. Suppression was measured in terms of AMF-mediated plant uptake of 33P mixed into a patch of soil and treatments included soil sterilization, soil mixing, pH manipulation and inoculation with isolated soil fungi. The degree of suppression was compared to volatile organic compound (VOC) production by isolated fungi and to multi-element analysis of soils. For a selected suppressive soil, sterilization and soil mixing experiments confirmed a biotic component of suppression. A Fusarium isolate from that soil suppressed the AMF activity and produced greater amounts than other fungal isolates of the antimicrobial VOC trichodiene (a trichothecene toxin precursor), beta-chamigrene, alpha-cuprenene and p-xylene. These metabolites deserve further attention when unravelling the chemical background behind the suppression of AMF activity by soil microorganisms. For the abiotic component of suppression, soil liming and acidification experiments confirmed that suppression was strongest at low pH. The pH effect might be associated with changed availability of specific suppressive elements. Indeed 33P uptake from the soil patches correlated negatively to Al levels and Al toxicity seems to play a major role in the AMF suppressiveness at pH below 5.0–5.2. However, the documentation of a biotic component of suppression for both low and high pH soils leads to the conclusion that biotic and abiotic components of suppression may act in parallel in some soils. The current insight into the components of soil suppressiveness of the AMF activity aids to develop management practices that allow for optimization of AMF functionality.",
keywords = "Aluminum, Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Fusarium, pH, Soil suppression, Volatile organic compounds",
author = "Carla Cruz-Paredes and Tomas Diera and Marie Davey and Rieckmann, {Maria Monrad} and Peter Christensen and {Dela Cruz}, Majbrit and Laursen, {Kristian Holst} and Joner, {Erik J.} and Christensen, {Jan H.} and Ole Nybroe and Iver Jakobsen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s)",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108305",
language = "English",
volume = "159",
journal = "Soil Biology & Biochemistry",
issn = "0038-0717",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling the abiotic and biotic components of AMF suppressive soils

AU - Cruz-Paredes, Carla

AU - Diera, Tomas

AU - Davey, Marie

AU - Rieckmann, Maria Monrad

AU - Christensen, Peter

AU - Dela Cruz, Majbrit

AU - Laursen, Kristian Holst

AU - Joner, Erik J.

AU - Christensen, Jan H.

AU - Nybroe, Ole

AU - Jakobsen, Iver

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are important in plant nutrient uptake, but their function is prone to environmental constraints including soil factors that may suppress AMF transfer of phosphorus (P) from the soil to the plant. The objective of this study was to disentangle the biotic and abiotic components of AMF-suppressive soils. Suppression was measured in terms of AMF-mediated plant uptake of 33P mixed into a patch of soil and treatments included soil sterilization, soil mixing, pH manipulation and inoculation with isolated soil fungi. The degree of suppression was compared to volatile organic compound (VOC) production by isolated fungi and to multi-element analysis of soils. For a selected suppressive soil, sterilization and soil mixing experiments confirmed a biotic component of suppression. A Fusarium isolate from that soil suppressed the AMF activity and produced greater amounts than other fungal isolates of the antimicrobial VOC trichodiene (a trichothecene toxin precursor), beta-chamigrene, alpha-cuprenene and p-xylene. These metabolites deserve further attention when unravelling the chemical background behind the suppression of AMF activity by soil microorganisms. For the abiotic component of suppression, soil liming and acidification experiments confirmed that suppression was strongest at low pH. The pH effect might be associated with changed availability of specific suppressive elements. Indeed 33P uptake from the soil patches correlated negatively to Al levels and Al toxicity seems to play a major role in the AMF suppressiveness at pH below 5.0–5.2. However, the documentation of a biotic component of suppression for both low and high pH soils leads to the conclusion that biotic and abiotic components of suppression may act in parallel in some soils. The current insight into the components of soil suppressiveness of the AMF activity aids to develop management practices that allow for optimization of AMF functionality.

AB - Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are important in plant nutrient uptake, but their function is prone to environmental constraints including soil factors that may suppress AMF transfer of phosphorus (P) from the soil to the plant. The objective of this study was to disentangle the biotic and abiotic components of AMF-suppressive soils. Suppression was measured in terms of AMF-mediated plant uptake of 33P mixed into a patch of soil and treatments included soil sterilization, soil mixing, pH manipulation and inoculation with isolated soil fungi. The degree of suppression was compared to volatile organic compound (VOC) production by isolated fungi and to multi-element analysis of soils. For a selected suppressive soil, sterilization and soil mixing experiments confirmed a biotic component of suppression. A Fusarium isolate from that soil suppressed the AMF activity and produced greater amounts than other fungal isolates of the antimicrobial VOC trichodiene (a trichothecene toxin precursor), beta-chamigrene, alpha-cuprenene and p-xylene. These metabolites deserve further attention when unravelling the chemical background behind the suppression of AMF activity by soil microorganisms. For the abiotic component of suppression, soil liming and acidification experiments confirmed that suppression was strongest at low pH. The pH effect might be associated with changed availability of specific suppressive elements. Indeed 33P uptake from the soil patches correlated negatively to Al levels and Al toxicity seems to play a major role in the AMF suppressiveness at pH below 5.0–5.2. However, the documentation of a biotic component of suppression for both low and high pH soils leads to the conclusion that biotic and abiotic components of suppression may act in parallel in some soils. The current insight into the components of soil suppressiveness of the AMF activity aids to develop management practices that allow for optimization of AMF functionality.

KW - Aluminum

KW - Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

KW - Fusarium

KW - pH

KW - Soil suppression

KW - Volatile organic compounds

U2 - 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108305

DO - 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108305

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85106215443

VL - 159

JO - Soil Biology & Biochemistry

JF - Soil Biology & Biochemistry

SN - 0038-0717

M1 - 108305

ER -

ID: 270568804