The Scent of Ant Brood: Caste Differences in Surface Hydrocarbons of Formica exsecta Pupae

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Scent of Ant Brood : Caste Differences in Surface Hydrocarbons of Formica exsecta Pupae. / Pulliainen, Unni; Bos, Nick; d'Ettorre, Patrizia; Sundström, Liselotte.

In: Journal of Chemical Ecology, Vol. 47, No. 6, 2021, p. 513-524.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Pulliainen, U, Bos, N, d'Ettorre, P & Sundström, L 2021, 'The Scent of Ant Brood: Caste Differences in Surface Hydrocarbons of Formica exsecta Pupae', Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-021-01275-w

APA

Pulliainen, U., Bos, N., d'Ettorre, P., & Sundström, L. (2021). The Scent of Ant Brood: Caste Differences in Surface Hydrocarbons of Formica exsecta Pupae. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 47(6), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-021-01275-w

Vancouver

Pulliainen U, Bos N, d'Ettorre P, Sundström L. The Scent of Ant Brood: Caste Differences in Surface Hydrocarbons of Formica exsecta Pupae. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2021;47(6):513-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-021-01275-w

Author

Pulliainen, Unni ; Bos, Nick ; d'Ettorre, Patrizia ; Sundström, Liselotte. / The Scent of Ant Brood : Caste Differences in Surface Hydrocarbons of Formica exsecta Pupae. In: Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2021 ; Vol. 47, No. 6. pp. 513-524.

Bibtex

@article{43ca362259f44e149ae2445971c78ce1,
title = "The Scent of Ant Brood: Caste Differences in Surface Hydrocarbons of Formica exsecta Pupae",
abstract = "Chemical communication is common across all organisms. Insects in particular use predominantly chemical stimuli in assessing their environment and recognizing their social counterparts. One of the chemical stimuli used for recognition in social insects, such as ants, is the suite of long-chain, cuticular hydrocarbons. In addition to providing waterproofing, these surface hydrocarbons serve as a signature mixture, which ants can perceive, and use to distinguish between strangers and colony mates, and to determine caste, sex, and reproductive status of another individual. They can be both environmentally and endogenously acquired. The surface chemistry of adult workers has been studied extensively in ants, yet the pupal stage has rarely been considered. Here we characterized the surface chemistry of pupae of Formica exsecta, and examine differences among sexes, castes (reproductive vs. worker), and types of sample (developing individual vs. cocoon envelope). We found quantitative and qualitative differences among both castes and types of sample, but male and female reproductives did not differ in their surface chemistry. We also found that the pupal surface chemistry was more complex than that of adult workers in this species. These results improve our understanding of the information on which ants base recognition, and highlights the diversity of surface chemistry in social insects across developmental stages.",
keywords = "Social insects, Ants, Surface hydrocarbons, Caste, Pupae, Formica",
author = "Unni Pulliainen and Nick Bos and Patrizia d'Ettorre and Liselotte Sundstr{\"o}m",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1007/s10886-021-01275-w",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "513--524",
journal = "Journal of Chemical Ecology",
issn = "0098-0331",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Scent of Ant Brood

T2 - Caste Differences in Surface Hydrocarbons of Formica exsecta Pupae

AU - Pulliainen, Unni

AU - Bos, Nick

AU - d'Ettorre, Patrizia

AU - Sundström, Liselotte

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Chemical communication is common across all organisms. Insects in particular use predominantly chemical stimuli in assessing their environment and recognizing their social counterparts. One of the chemical stimuli used for recognition in social insects, such as ants, is the suite of long-chain, cuticular hydrocarbons. In addition to providing waterproofing, these surface hydrocarbons serve as a signature mixture, which ants can perceive, and use to distinguish between strangers and colony mates, and to determine caste, sex, and reproductive status of another individual. They can be both environmentally and endogenously acquired. The surface chemistry of adult workers has been studied extensively in ants, yet the pupal stage has rarely been considered. Here we characterized the surface chemistry of pupae of Formica exsecta, and examine differences among sexes, castes (reproductive vs. worker), and types of sample (developing individual vs. cocoon envelope). We found quantitative and qualitative differences among both castes and types of sample, but male and female reproductives did not differ in their surface chemistry. We also found that the pupal surface chemistry was more complex than that of adult workers in this species. These results improve our understanding of the information on which ants base recognition, and highlights the diversity of surface chemistry in social insects across developmental stages.

AB - Chemical communication is common across all organisms. Insects in particular use predominantly chemical stimuli in assessing their environment and recognizing their social counterparts. One of the chemical stimuli used for recognition in social insects, such as ants, is the suite of long-chain, cuticular hydrocarbons. In addition to providing waterproofing, these surface hydrocarbons serve as a signature mixture, which ants can perceive, and use to distinguish between strangers and colony mates, and to determine caste, sex, and reproductive status of another individual. They can be both environmentally and endogenously acquired. The surface chemistry of adult workers has been studied extensively in ants, yet the pupal stage has rarely been considered. Here we characterized the surface chemistry of pupae of Formica exsecta, and examine differences among sexes, castes (reproductive vs. worker), and types of sample (developing individual vs. cocoon envelope). We found quantitative and qualitative differences among both castes and types of sample, but male and female reproductives did not differ in their surface chemistry. We also found that the pupal surface chemistry was more complex than that of adult workers in this species. These results improve our understanding of the information on which ants base recognition, and highlights the diversity of surface chemistry in social insects across developmental stages.

KW - Social insects

KW - Ants

KW - Surface hydrocarbons

KW - Caste

KW - Pupae

KW - Formica

U2 - 10.1007/s10886-021-01275-w

DO - 10.1007/s10886-021-01275-w

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33900528

VL - 47

SP - 513

EP - 524

JO - Journal of Chemical Ecology

JF - Journal of Chemical Ecology

SN - 0098-0331

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 261216259