Comparative Analysis of Sample Extraction and Library Construction for Shotgun Metagenomics

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Comparative Analysis of Sample Extraction and Library Construction for Shotgun Metagenomics. / Peng, Zonghui; Zhu, Xiaolong; Wang, Zhijiao; Yan, Xianting; Wang, Guangbiao; Tang, Meifang; Jiang, Awei; Kristiansen, Karsten.

In: Bioinformatics and Biology Insights, Vol. 14, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Peng, Z, Zhu, X, Wang, Z, Yan, X, Wang, G, Tang, M, Jiang, A & Kristiansen, K 2020, 'Comparative Analysis of Sample Extraction and Library Construction for Shotgun Metagenomics', Bioinformatics and Biology Insights, vol. 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177932220915459

APA

Peng, Z., Zhu, X., Wang, Z., Yan, X., Wang, G., Tang, M., Jiang, A., & Kristiansen, K. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Sample Extraction and Library Construction for Shotgun Metagenomics. Bioinformatics and Biology Insights, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177932220915459

Vancouver

Peng Z, Zhu X, Wang Z, Yan X, Wang G, Tang M et al. Comparative Analysis of Sample Extraction and Library Construction for Shotgun Metagenomics. Bioinformatics and Biology Insights. 2020;14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177932220915459

Author

Peng, Zonghui ; Zhu, Xiaolong ; Wang, Zhijiao ; Yan, Xianting ; Wang, Guangbiao ; Tang, Meifang ; Jiang, Awei ; Kristiansen, Karsten. / Comparative Analysis of Sample Extraction and Library Construction for Shotgun Metagenomics. In: Bioinformatics and Biology Insights. 2020 ; Vol. 14.

Bibtex

@article{4c7ccb49682b4257aefe0c441a47e935,
title = "Comparative Analysis of Sample Extraction and Library Construction for Shotgun Metagenomics",
abstract = "Human fecal specimens, serve as important materials, are widely used in the field of microbiome research, in which inconsistent results have been a pressing issue. The possible attribute factors have been proposed including the specimen status after preservation, extracted DNA quality, library preparation protocol, and sample DNA input. In this study, quality comparisons for shotgun metagenomics sequencing were performed between 2 DNA extraction methods for fresh and freeze-thaw samples, 2 library preparation protocols, and various sample inputs. The results indicate that Mag-Bind{\textregistered} Universal Metagenomics Kit (OM) outperformed DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (QP) with a higher DNA quantity. Controlling on library preparation protocol, OM detected on-average more genes than QP. For library construction comparison by controlling on the same DNA sample, KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (KH) outperformed the TruePrep DNA Library Prep Kit V2 (TP) with the higher number of detected genes number and Shannon index. No significant differences were found in taxonomy between 2 library preparation protocols using the fresh, freeze-thaw and mock community samples. No significant difference was observed between 250 and 50 ng DNA inputs for library preparation on both fresh and freeze-thaw samples. Through the preliminary study, a combined protocol is recommended for performing metagenomics studies, by using OM method plus KH protocol as well as suitable DNA quantity on either fresh or freeze-thaw samples. Our findings provide clues for potential variations from various DNA extraction methods, library protocols, and sample DNA inputs, which are critical for consistent and comprehensive profiling of the human gut microbiome.",
keywords = "DNA isolation method, library preparation protocol, Metagenomics, sample input, sample preservation",
author = "Zonghui Peng and Xiaolong Zhu and Zhijiao Wang and Xianting Yan and Guangbiao Wang and Meifang Tang and Awei Jiang and Karsten Kristiansen",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1177/1177932220915459",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Bioinformatics and Biology Insights",
issn = "1177-9322",
publisher = "Libertas Academica Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative Analysis of Sample Extraction and Library Construction for Shotgun Metagenomics

AU - Peng, Zonghui

AU - Zhu, Xiaolong

AU - Wang, Zhijiao

AU - Yan, Xianting

AU - Wang, Guangbiao

AU - Tang, Meifang

AU - Jiang, Awei

AU - Kristiansen, Karsten

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Human fecal specimens, serve as important materials, are widely used in the field of microbiome research, in which inconsistent results have been a pressing issue. The possible attribute factors have been proposed including the specimen status after preservation, extracted DNA quality, library preparation protocol, and sample DNA input. In this study, quality comparisons for shotgun metagenomics sequencing were performed between 2 DNA extraction methods for fresh and freeze-thaw samples, 2 library preparation protocols, and various sample inputs. The results indicate that Mag-Bind® Universal Metagenomics Kit (OM) outperformed DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (QP) with a higher DNA quantity. Controlling on library preparation protocol, OM detected on-average more genes than QP. For library construction comparison by controlling on the same DNA sample, KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (KH) outperformed the TruePrep DNA Library Prep Kit V2 (TP) with the higher number of detected genes number and Shannon index. No significant differences were found in taxonomy between 2 library preparation protocols using the fresh, freeze-thaw and mock community samples. No significant difference was observed between 250 and 50 ng DNA inputs for library preparation on both fresh and freeze-thaw samples. Through the preliminary study, a combined protocol is recommended for performing metagenomics studies, by using OM method plus KH protocol as well as suitable DNA quantity on either fresh or freeze-thaw samples. Our findings provide clues for potential variations from various DNA extraction methods, library protocols, and sample DNA inputs, which are critical for consistent and comprehensive profiling of the human gut microbiome.

AB - Human fecal specimens, serve as important materials, are widely used in the field of microbiome research, in which inconsistent results have been a pressing issue. The possible attribute factors have been proposed including the specimen status after preservation, extracted DNA quality, library preparation protocol, and sample DNA input. In this study, quality comparisons for shotgun metagenomics sequencing were performed between 2 DNA extraction methods for fresh and freeze-thaw samples, 2 library preparation protocols, and various sample inputs. The results indicate that Mag-Bind® Universal Metagenomics Kit (OM) outperformed DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (QP) with a higher DNA quantity. Controlling on library preparation protocol, OM detected on-average more genes than QP. For library construction comparison by controlling on the same DNA sample, KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (KH) outperformed the TruePrep DNA Library Prep Kit V2 (TP) with the higher number of detected genes number and Shannon index. No significant differences were found in taxonomy between 2 library preparation protocols using the fresh, freeze-thaw and mock community samples. No significant difference was observed between 250 and 50 ng DNA inputs for library preparation on both fresh and freeze-thaw samples. Through the preliminary study, a combined protocol is recommended for performing metagenomics studies, by using OM method plus KH protocol as well as suitable DNA quantity on either fresh or freeze-thaw samples. Our findings provide clues for potential variations from various DNA extraction methods, library protocols, and sample DNA inputs, which are critical for consistent and comprehensive profiling of the human gut microbiome.

KW - DNA isolation method

KW - library preparation protocol

KW - Metagenomics

KW - sample input

KW - sample preservation

U2 - 10.1177/1177932220915459

DO - 10.1177/1177932220915459

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32546984

AN - SCOPUS:85085987153

VL - 14

JO - Bioinformatics and Biology Insights

JF - Bioinformatics and Biology Insights

SN - 1177-9322

ER -

ID: 243191407