Beyond fossil calibrations: realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Beyond fossil calibrations : realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology. / Hipsley, Christy A.; Müller, Johannes.

I: Frontiers in Genetics, Bind 5, 138, 2014.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hipsley, CA & Müller, J 2014, 'Beyond fossil calibrations: realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology', Frontiers in Genetics, bind 5, 138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00138

APA

Hipsley, C. A., & Müller, J. (2014). Beyond fossil calibrations: realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology. Frontiers in Genetics, 5, [138]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00138

Vancouver

Hipsley CA, Müller J. Beyond fossil calibrations: realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology. Frontiers in Genetics. 2014;5. 138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00138

Author

Hipsley, Christy A. ; Müller, Johannes. / Beyond fossil calibrations : realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology. I: Frontiers in Genetics. 2014 ; Bind 5.

Bibtex

@article{835f8c18e321468e907a5504e7641d86,
title = "Beyond fossil calibrations: realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology",
abstract = "Molecular-based divergence dating methods, or molecular clocks, are the primary neontological tool for estimating the temporal origins of clades. While the appropriate use of vertebrate fossils as external clock calibrations has stimulated heated discussions in the paleontological community, less attention has been given to the quality and implementation of other calibration types. In lieu of appropriate fossils, many studies rely on alternative sources of age constraints based on geological events, substitution rates and heterochronous sampling, as well as dates secondarily derived from previous analyses. To illustrate the breadth and frequency of calibration types currently employed, we conducted a literature survey of over 600 articles published from 2007 to 2013. Over half of all analyses implemented one or more fossil dates as constraints, followed by geological events and secondary calibrations (15% each). Vertebrate taxa were subjects in nearly half of all studies, while invertebrates and plants together accounted for 43%, followed by viruses, protists and fungi (3% each). Current patterns in calibration practices were disproportionate to the number of discussions on their proper use, particularly regarding plants and secondarily derived dates, which are both relatively neglected in methodological evaluations. Based on our survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest approaches in clock calibration, and outline strengths and weaknesses associated with each. This critique should serve as a call to action for researchers across multiple communities, particularly those working on clades for which fossil records are poor, to develop their own guidelines regarding selection and implementation of alternative calibration types. This issue is particularly relevant now, as time-calibrated phylogenies are used for more than dating evolutionary origins, but often serve as the backbone of investigations into biogeography, diversity dynamics and rates of phenotypic evolution.",
keywords = "Calibration, Divergence dating, Fossil, Molecular clock, Node age prior, Vertebrate paleontology",
author = "Hipsley, {Christy A.} and Johannes M{\"u}ller",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3389/fgene.2014.00138",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Frontiers in Genetics",
issn = "1664-8021",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond fossil calibrations

T2 - realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology

AU - Hipsley, Christy A.

AU - Müller, Johannes

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Molecular-based divergence dating methods, or molecular clocks, are the primary neontological tool for estimating the temporal origins of clades. While the appropriate use of vertebrate fossils as external clock calibrations has stimulated heated discussions in the paleontological community, less attention has been given to the quality and implementation of other calibration types. In lieu of appropriate fossils, many studies rely on alternative sources of age constraints based on geological events, substitution rates and heterochronous sampling, as well as dates secondarily derived from previous analyses. To illustrate the breadth and frequency of calibration types currently employed, we conducted a literature survey of over 600 articles published from 2007 to 2013. Over half of all analyses implemented one or more fossil dates as constraints, followed by geological events and secondary calibrations (15% each). Vertebrate taxa were subjects in nearly half of all studies, while invertebrates and plants together accounted for 43%, followed by viruses, protists and fungi (3% each). Current patterns in calibration practices were disproportionate to the number of discussions on their proper use, particularly regarding plants and secondarily derived dates, which are both relatively neglected in methodological evaluations. Based on our survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest approaches in clock calibration, and outline strengths and weaknesses associated with each. This critique should serve as a call to action for researchers across multiple communities, particularly those working on clades for which fossil records are poor, to develop their own guidelines regarding selection and implementation of alternative calibration types. This issue is particularly relevant now, as time-calibrated phylogenies are used for more than dating evolutionary origins, but often serve as the backbone of investigations into biogeography, diversity dynamics and rates of phenotypic evolution.

AB - Molecular-based divergence dating methods, or molecular clocks, are the primary neontological tool for estimating the temporal origins of clades. While the appropriate use of vertebrate fossils as external clock calibrations has stimulated heated discussions in the paleontological community, less attention has been given to the quality and implementation of other calibration types. In lieu of appropriate fossils, many studies rely on alternative sources of age constraints based on geological events, substitution rates and heterochronous sampling, as well as dates secondarily derived from previous analyses. To illustrate the breadth and frequency of calibration types currently employed, we conducted a literature survey of over 600 articles published from 2007 to 2013. Over half of all analyses implemented one or more fossil dates as constraints, followed by geological events and secondary calibrations (15% each). Vertebrate taxa were subjects in nearly half of all studies, while invertebrates and plants together accounted for 43%, followed by viruses, protists and fungi (3% each). Current patterns in calibration practices were disproportionate to the number of discussions on their proper use, particularly regarding plants and secondarily derived dates, which are both relatively neglected in methodological evaluations. Based on our survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest approaches in clock calibration, and outline strengths and weaknesses associated with each. This critique should serve as a call to action for researchers across multiple communities, particularly those working on clades for which fossil records are poor, to develop their own guidelines regarding selection and implementation of alternative calibration types. This issue is particularly relevant now, as time-calibrated phylogenies are used for more than dating evolutionary origins, but often serve as the backbone of investigations into biogeography, diversity dynamics and rates of phenotypic evolution.

KW - Calibration

KW - Divergence dating

KW - Fossil

KW - Molecular clock

KW - Node age prior

KW - Vertebrate paleontology

U2 - 10.3389/fgene.2014.00138

DO - 10.3389/fgene.2014.00138

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84905638405

VL - 5

JO - Frontiers in Genetics

JF - Frontiers in Genetics

SN - 1664-8021

M1 - 138

ER -

ID: 255689332