Rose replant disease: detailed analyses of plant reactions, root endophytes and rhizosphere microbial communities

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Rose replant disease : detailed analyses of plant reactions, root endophytes and rhizosphere microbial communities. / Baumann, A.; Yim, B.; Grunewaldt-Stöcker, G.; Liu, B.; Beerhues, L.; Sapp, M.; Nesme, J.; Sørensen, S. J.; Smalla, K.; Winkelmann, T.

I: Acta Horticulturae, Bind 1283, 2020, s. 97-104.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Baumann, A, Yim, B, Grunewaldt-Stöcker, G, Liu, B, Beerhues, L, Sapp, M, Nesme, J, Sørensen, SJ, Smalla, K & Winkelmann, T 2020, 'Rose replant disease: detailed analyses of plant reactions, root endophytes and rhizosphere microbial communities', Acta Horticulturae, bind 1283, s. 97-104. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1283.14

APA

Baumann, A., Yim, B., Grunewaldt-Stöcker, G., Liu, B., Beerhues, L., Sapp, M., Nesme, J., Sørensen, S. J., Smalla, K., & Winkelmann, T. (2020). Rose replant disease: detailed analyses of plant reactions, root endophytes and rhizosphere microbial communities. Acta Horticulturae, 1283, 97-104. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1283.14

Vancouver

Baumann A, Yim B, Grunewaldt-Stöcker G, Liu B, Beerhues L, Sapp M o.a. Rose replant disease: detailed analyses of plant reactions, root endophytes and rhizosphere microbial communities. Acta Horticulturae. 2020;1283:97-104. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1283.14

Author

Baumann, A. ; Yim, B. ; Grunewaldt-Stöcker, G. ; Liu, B. ; Beerhues, L. ; Sapp, M. ; Nesme, J. ; Sørensen, S. J. ; Smalla, K. ; Winkelmann, T. / Rose replant disease : detailed analyses of plant reactions, root endophytes and rhizosphere microbial communities. I: Acta Horticulturae. 2020 ; Bind 1283. s. 97-104.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{e8ed2f1877084eb7b63568da5287557f,
title = "Rose replant disease: detailed analyses of plant reactions, root endophytes and rhizosphere microbial communities",
abstract = "Garden rose production involves field culture for rootstock production and cultivation of grafted plants. When roses are replanted at the same site, reduced growth, stunting and discoloration of roots are observed. This phenomenon is well-known as rose replant disease (RRD), which results in considerable economic losses. Until now, the causes of RRD are largely unknown and measures to overcome RRD are lacking. In contrast to apple, research on replant disease in roses is scarce. In this study, we have carried out a greenhouse pot experiment, using either untreated or gamma irradiated RRD soils from two sites. Slow release fertilizer was added to the soils before planting seedlings of the rootstock Rosa corymbifera {\textquoteleft}Laxa{\textquoteright}. After eight weeks, shoot and root growth were recorded, roots were examined by detailed microscopic analyses and secondary metabolites were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Rhizosphere samples were taken and their respective microbial communities were analyzed by amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for bacteria and archaea as well as the ITS2 and cox2 region for fungi and oomycetes, respectively. Finally, segments of surface-disinfected roots were placed on 523 medium and outgrowing endophytic bacteria were isolated and identified. For both soils, significantly higher shoot and root biomass were observed for plants growing in irradiated compared to untreated soils. Roots were darkened, deformed and finally damaged in their outer cell layers when growing in untreated RRD soil. This corresponded to higher concentrations of two catechin derivatives and gallic acid in roots in this RRD soil compared to roots in the irradiated variants. Twenty-six endophytic bacterial isolates were obtained from roots that were affiliated to 15 different bacterial genera. Rhizosphere microbial community compositions not only differed significantly between soils of the two sites, but also between treatments (untreated versus gamma irradiated) for bacteria, fungi and oomycetes. The identification of genera differing in relative abundance in the different soils and treatments will provide a deeper insight in causal agents of RRD as well as antagonists or beneficials. Future analyses should include different rootstock species in order to identify RRD tolerant germplasm.",
keywords = "Amplicon sequencing, Bio-test, Endophytes, Replant problems, Rosa, Secondary metabolites, Soil sickness",
author = "A. Baumann and B. Yim and G. Grunewaldt-St{\"o}cker and B. Liu and L. Beerhues and M. Sapp and J. Nesme and S{\o}rensen, {S. J.} and K. Smalla and T. Winkelmann",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1283.14",
language = "English",
volume = "1283",
pages = "97--104",
journal = "Acta Horticulturae",
issn = "0567-7572",
publisher = "International Society for Horticultural Science",
note = "XXVI International Eucarpia Symposium : Section Ornamentals ; Conference date: 01-09-2019 Through 04-09-2019",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Rose replant disease

T2 - XXVI International Eucarpia Symposium

AU - Baumann, A.

AU - Yim, B.

AU - Grunewaldt-Stöcker, G.

AU - Liu, B.

AU - Beerhues, L.

AU - Sapp, M.

AU - Nesme, J.

AU - Sørensen, S. J.

AU - Smalla, K.

AU - Winkelmann, T.

N1 - Conference code: 26

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Garden rose production involves field culture for rootstock production and cultivation of grafted plants. When roses are replanted at the same site, reduced growth, stunting and discoloration of roots are observed. This phenomenon is well-known as rose replant disease (RRD), which results in considerable economic losses. Until now, the causes of RRD are largely unknown and measures to overcome RRD are lacking. In contrast to apple, research on replant disease in roses is scarce. In this study, we have carried out a greenhouse pot experiment, using either untreated or gamma irradiated RRD soils from two sites. Slow release fertilizer was added to the soils before planting seedlings of the rootstock Rosa corymbifera ‘Laxa’. After eight weeks, shoot and root growth were recorded, roots were examined by detailed microscopic analyses and secondary metabolites were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Rhizosphere samples were taken and their respective microbial communities were analyzed by amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for bacteria and archaea as well as the ITS2 and cox2 region for fungi and oomycetes, respectively. Finally, segments of surface-disinfected roots were placed on 523 medium and outgrowing endophytic bacteria were isolated and identified. For both soils, significantly higher shoot and root biomass were observed for plants growing in irradiated compared to untreated soils. Roots were darkened, deformed and finally damaged in their outer cell layers when growing in untreated RRD soil. This corresponded to higher concentrations of two catechin derivatives and gallic acid in roots in this RRD soil compared to roots in the irradiated variants. Twenty-six endophytic bacterial isolates were obtained from roots that were affiliated to 15 different bacterial genera. Rhizosphere microbial community compositions not only differed significantly between soils of the two sites, but also between treatments (untreated versus gamma irradiated) for bacteria, fungi and oomycetes. The identification of genera differing in relative abundance in the different soils and treatments will provide a deeper insight in causal agents of RRD as well as antagonists or beneficials. Future analyses should include different rootstock species in order to identify RRD tolerant germplasm.

AB - Garden rose production involves field culture for rootstock production and cultivation of grafted plants. When roses are replanted at the same site, reduced growth, stunting and discoloration of roots are observed. This phenomenon is well-known as rose replant disease (RRD), which results in considerable economic losses. Until now, the causes of RRD are largely unknown and measures to overcome RRD are lacking. In contrast to apple, research on replant disease in roses is scarce. In this study, we have carried out a greenhouse pot experiment, using either untreated or gamma irradiated RRD soils from two sites. Slow release fertilizer was added to the soils before planting seedlings of the rootstock Rosa corymbifera ‘Laxa’. After eight weeks, shoot and root growth were recorded, roots were examined by detailed microscopic analyses and secondary metabolites were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Rhizosphere samples were taken and their respective microbial communities were analyzed by amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for bacteria and archaea as well as the ITS2 and cox2 region for fungi and oomycetes, respectively. Finally, segments of surface-disinfected roots were placed on 523 medium and outgrowing endophytic bacteria were isolated and identified. For both soils, significantly higher shoot and root biomass were observed for plants growing in irradiated compared to untreated soils. Roots were darkened, deformed and finally damaged in their outer cell layers when growing in untreated RRD soil. This corresponded to higher concentrations of two catechin derivatives and gallic acid in roots in this RRD soil compared to roots in the irradiated variants. Twenty-six endophytic bacterial isolates were obtained from roots that were affiliated to 15 different bacterial genera. Rhizosphere microbial community compositions not only differed significantly between soils of the two sites, but also between treatments (untreated versus gamma irradiated) for bacteria, fungi and oomycetes. The identification of genera differing in relative abundance in the different soils and treatments will provide a deeper insight in causal agents of RRD as well as antagonists or beneficials. Future analyses should include different rootstock species in order to identify RRD tolerant germplasm.

KW - Amplicon sequencing

KW - Bio-test

KW - Endophytes

KW - Replant problems

KW - Rosa

KW - Secondary metabolites

KW - Soil sickness

U2 - 10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1283.14

DO - 10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1283.14

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85089387339

VL - 1283

SP - 97

EP - 104

JO - Acta Horticulturae

JF - Acta Horticulturae

SN - 0567-7572

Y2 - 1 September 2019 through 4 September 2019

ER -

ID: 248190748