Swimming in unsteady water flows: is turning in a changing flow an energetically expensive endeavor for fish?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Swimming in unsteady water flows : is turning in a changing flow an energetically expensive endeavor for fish? / Schakmann, Mathias; Steffensen, John F.; Bushnell, Peter G.; Korsmeyer, Keith E.

I: The Journal of Experimental Biology, Bind 223, Nr. 6, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Schakmann, M, Steffensen, JF, Bushnell, PG & Korsmeyer, KE 2020, 'Swimming in unsteady water flows: is turning in a changing flow an energetically expensive endeavor for fish?', The Journal of Experimental Biology, bind 223, nr. 6. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.212795

APA

Schakmann, M., Steffensen, J. F., Bushnell, P. G., & Korsmeyer, K. E. (2020). Swimming in unsteady water flows: is turning in a changing flow an energetically expensive endeavor for fish? The Journal of Experimental Biology, 223(6). https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.212795

Vancouver

Schakmann M, Steffensen JF, Bushnell PG, Korsmeyer KE. Swimming in unsteady water flows: is turning in a changing flow an energetically expensive endeavor for fish? The Journal of Experimental Biology. 2020;223(6). https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.212795

Author

Schakmann, Mathias ; Steffensen, John F. ; Bushnell, Peter G. ; Korsmeyer, Keith E. / Swimming in unsteady water flows : is turning in a changing flow an energetically expensive endeavor for fish?. I: The Journal of Experimental Biology. 2020 ; Bind 223, Nr. 6.

Bibtex

@article{f6742ce615b24049acef593fd2c13ff9,
title = "Swimming in unsteady water flows: is turning in a changing flow an energetically expensive endeavor for fish?",
abstract = "Unsteady, dynamic flow regimes commonly found in shallow marine ecosystems such as coral reefs pose an energetic challenge for mobile organisms that typically depend on station-holding for fitness-related activities. The majority of experimental studies, however, have measured energetic costs of locomotion at steady speeds, with only a few studies measuring the effects of oscillatory flows. In this study, we used a bidirectional swimming respirometer to create six oscillatory water flow regimes consisting of three frequency and amplitude combinations for both unidirectional and bidirectional oscillatory flows. Using the goldring surgeonfish, Ctenochaetus strigosus, a pectoral-fin (labriform) swimmer, we quantified the net cost of swimming (swimming metabolic rate minus standard metabolic rate) associated with station-holding under these various conditions. We determined that the swimming costs of station-holding in the bidirectional flow regime increased by 2-fold compared with costs based on swimming over the same range of speeds at steady velocities. Furthermore, as we found minimal differences in energetic costs associated with station-holding in the unidirectional, oscillating flow compared with that predicted from steady swimming costs, we conclude that the added acceleration costs are minimal, while the act of turning is an energetically expensive endeavor for this reef fish species.",
author = "Mathias Schakmann and Steffensen, {John F.} and Bushnell, {Peter G.} and Korsmeyer, {Keith E.}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1242/jeb.212795",
language = "English",
volume = "223",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Biology",
issn = "0022-0949",
publisher = "The/Company of Biologists Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Swimming in unsteady water flows

T2 - is turning in a changing flow an energetically expensive endeavor for fish?

AU - Schakmann, Mathias

AU - Steffensen, John F.

AU - Bushnell, Peter G.

AU - Korsmeyer, Keith E.

N1 - © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Unsteady, dynamic flow regimes commonly found in shallow marine ecosystems such as coral reefs pose an energetic challenge for mobile organisms that typically depend on station-holding for fitness-related activities. The majority of experimental studies, however, have measured energetic costs of locomotion at steady speeds, with only a few studies measuring the effects of oscillatory flows. In this study, we used a bidirectional swimming respirometer to create six oscillatory water flow regimes consisting of three frequency and amplitude combinations for both unidirectional and bidirectional oscillatory flows. Using the goldring surgeonfish, Ctenochaetus strigosus, a pectoral-fin (labriform) swimmer, we quantified the net cost of swimming (swimming metabolic rate minus standard metabolic rate) associated with station-holding under these various conditions. We determined that the swimming costs of station-holding in the bidirectional flow regime increased by 2-fold compared with costs based on swimming over the same range of speeds at steady velocities. Furthermore, as we found minimal differences in energetic costs associated with station-holding in the unidirectional, oscillating flow compared with that predicted from steady swimming costs, we conclude that the added acceleration costs are minimal, while the act of turning is an energetically expensive endeavor for this reef fish species.

AB - Unsteady, dynamic flow regimes commonly found in shallow marine ecosystems such as coral reefs pose an energetic challenge for mobile organisms that typically depend on station-holding for fitness-related activities. The majority of experimental studies, however, have measured energetic costs of locomotion at steady speeds, with only a few studies measuring the effects of oscillatory flows. In this study, we used a bidirectional swimming respirometer to create six oscillatory water flow regimes consisting of three frequency and amplitude combinations for both unidirectional and bidirectional oscillatory flows. Using the goldring surgeonfish, Ctenochaetus strigosus, a pectoral-fin (labriform) swimmer, we quantified the net cost of swimming (swimming metabolic rate minus standard metabolic rate) associated with station-holding under these various conditions. We determined that the swimming costs of station-holding in the bidirectional flow regime increased by 2-fold compared with costs based on swimming over the same range of speeds at steady velocities. Furthermore, as we found minimal differences in energetic costs associated with station-holding in the unidirectional, oscillating flow compared with that predicted from steady swimming costs, we conclude that the added acceleration costs are minimal, while the act of turning is an energetically expensive endeavor for this reef fish species.

U2 - 10.1242/jeb.212795

DO - 10.1242/jeb.212795

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32041805

VL - 223

JO - Journal of Experimental Biology

JF - Journal of Experimental Biology

SN - 0022-0949

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 240638387