Biochar application differentially affects soil micro-, meso-macro-fauna and plant productivity within a nature restoration grassland

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Biochar application differentially affects soil micro-, meso-macro-fauna and plant productivity within a nature restoration grassland. / Jeffery, Simon; van de Voorde, Tess F. J.; Harris, W. Edwin; Mommer, Liesje; Van Groenigen, Jan Willem; De Deyn, Gerlinde B.; Ekelund, Flemming; Briones, Maria J. I.; Bezemer, T. Martijn.

In: Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Vol. 174, 108789, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jeffery, S, van de Voorde, TFJ, Harris, WE, Mommer, L, Van Groenigen, JW, De Deyn, GB, Ekelund, F, Briones, MJI & Bezemer, TM 2022, 'Biochar application differentially affects soil micro-, meso-macro-fauna and plant productivity within a nature restoration grassland', Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 174, 108789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108789

APA

Jeffery, S., van de Voorde, T. F. J., Harris, W. E., Mommer, L., Van Groenigen, J. W., De Deyn, G. B., Ekelund, F., Briones, M. J. I., & Bezemer, T. M. (2022). Biochar application differentially affects soil micro-, meso-macro-fauna and plant productivity within a nature restoration grassland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 174, [108789]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108789

Vancouver

Jeffery S, van de Voorde TFJ, Harris WE, Mommer L, Van Groenigen JW, De Deyn GB et al. Biochar application differentially affects soil micro-, meso-macro-fauna and plant productivity within a nature restoration grassland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2022;174. 108789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108789

Author

Jeffery, Simon ; van de Voorde, Tess F. J. ; Harris, W. Edwin ; Mommer, Liesje ; Van Groenigen, Jan Willem ; De Deyn, Gerlinde B. ; Ekelund, Flemming ; Briones, Maria J. I. ; Bezemer, T. Martijn. / Biochar application differentially affects soil micro-, meso-macro-fauna and plant productivity within a nature restoration grassland. In: Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2022 ; Vol. 174.

Bibtex

@article{ab958b3d54304681b588aab085e6f465,
title = "Biochar application differentially affects soil micro-, meso-macro-fauna and plant productivity within a nature restoration grassland",
abstract = "Biochar is proposed as an option to sequester carbon (C) in soils and promote other soil-based ecosystem services. However, its impact on soil biota from micro to macroscale remains poorly understood. We investigated biochar effects on the soil biota across the soil food web, on plant community composition and on biomass production. We conducted a field experiment in a nature restoration grassland testing four treatments: two biochar types (herbaceous feedstock pyrolyzed at 400 °C or 600 °C – hereafter B400 and B600), and a positive (i.e. unpyrolysed biochar feedstock, hereafter Hay) and negative (no addition) control. Responses of plants and soil biota were evaluated one and three years after establishing the treatments. Soil pH and K concentrations increased significantly in the B600 treatment. Mite abundances were significantly higher in B400 whereas nematode abundances were highest in Hay (1st year) and lowest in B400 (3rd year). Other soil fauna groups (enchytraeids and earthworms) varied more between years than between treatments. Legume cover increased significantly in the biochar treatments but this effect was transient. Legumes, grasses and primary productivity also showed a statistically significant Treatment x Year interaction due to transitory effects that were no longer present by the 3rd year. Our results suggest that biochar produced from meadow cuttings and applied at the 10 t/ha rate cause transitory impacts on soil biota abundance and plant communities over the 3-year timeframe used for this experiment. Therefore, this type of biochar could potentially be used for soil carbon sequestration, with minimal impacts on soil biota abundance or diversity, within the groups studied here, or plant biodiversity and productivity. Further research is required to investigate the longer-term impacts of this potential soil C storage sink.",
keywords = "Biochar, Carbon sequestration, Grassland, Microbial biomass, Nature restoration, PLFA, Soil fauna",
author = "Simon Jeffery and {van de Voorde}, {Tess F. J.} and Harris, {W. Edwin} and Liesje Mommer and {Van Groenigen}, {Jan Willem} and {De Deyn}, {Gerlinde B.} and Flemming Ekelund and Briones, {Maria J. I.} and Bezemer, {T. Martijn}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108789",
language = "English",
volume = "174",
journal = "Soil Biology & Biochemistry",
issn = "0038-0717",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biochar application differentially affects soil micro-, meso-macro-fauna and plant productivity within a nature restoration grassland

AU - Jeffery, Simon

AU - van de Voorde, Tess F. J.

AU - Harris, W. Edwin

AU - Mommer, Liesje

AU - Van Groenigen, Jan Willem

AU - De Deyn, Gerlinde B.

AU - Ekelund, Flemming

AU - Briones, Maria J. I.

AU - Bezemer, T. Martijn

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Biochar is proposed as an option to sequester carbon (C) in soils and promote other soil-based ecosystem services. However, its impact on soil biota from micro to macroscale remains poorly understood. We investigated biochar effects on the soil biota across the soil food web, on plant community composition and on biomass production. We conducted a field experiment in a nature restoration grassland testing four treatments: two biochar types (herbaceous feedstock pyrolyzed at 400 °C or 600 °C – hereafter B400 and B600), and a positive (i.e. unpyrolysed biochar feedstock, hereafter Hay) and negative (no addition) control. Responses of plants and soil biota were evaluated one and three years after establishing the treatments. Soil pH and K concentrations increased significantly in the B600 treatment. Mite abundances were significantly higher in B400 whereas nematode abundances were highest in Hay (1st year) and lowest in B400 (3rd year). Other soil fauna groups (enchytraeids and earthworms) varied more between years than between treatments. Legume cover increased significantly in the biochar treatments but this effect was transient. Legumes, grasses and primary productivity also showed a statistically significant Treatment x Year interaction due to transitory effects that were no longer present by the 3rd year. Our results suggest that biochar produced from meadow cuttings and applied at the 10 t/ha rate cause transitory impacts on soil biota abundance and plant communities over the 3-year timeframe used for this experiment. Therefore, this type of biochar could potentially be used for soil carbon sequestration, with minimal impacts on soil biota abundance or diversity, within the groups studied here, or plant biodiversity and productivity. Further research is required to investigate the longer-term impacts of this potential soil C storage sink.

AB - Biochar is proposed as an option to sequester carbon (C) in soils and promote other soil-based ecosystem services. However, its impact on soil biota from micro to macroscale remains poorly understood. We investigated biochar effects on the soil biota across the soil food web, on plant community composition and on biomass production. We conducted a field experiment in a nature restoration grassland testing four treatments: two biochar types (herbaceous feedstock pyrolyzed at 400 °C or 600 °C – hereafter B400 and B600), and a positive (i.e. unpyrolysed biochar feedstock, hereafter Hay) and negative (no addition) control. Responses of plants and soil biota were evaluated one and three years after establishing the treatments. Soil pH and K concentrations increased significantly in the B600 treatment. Mite abundances were significantly higher in B400 whereas nematode abundances were highest in Hay (1st year) and lowest in B400 (3rd year). Other soil fauna groups (enchytraeids and earthworms) varied more between years than between treatments. Legume cover increased significantly in the biochar treatments but this effect was transient. Legumes, grasses and primary productivity also showed a statistically significant Treatment x Year interaction due to transitory effects that were no longer present by the 3rd year. Our results suggest that biochar produced from meadow cuttings and applied at the 10 t/ha rate cause transitory impacts on soil biota abundance and plant communities over the 3-year timeframe used for this experiment. Therefore, this type of biochar could potentially be used for soil carbon sequestration, with minimal impacts on soil biota abundance or diversity, within the groups studied here, or plant biodiversity and productivity. Further research is required to investigate the longer-term impacts of this potential soil C storage sink.

KW - Biochar

KW - Carbon sequestration

KW - Grassland

KW - Microbial biomass

KW - Nature restoration

KW - PLFA

KW - Soil fauna

U2 - 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108789

DO - 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108789

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85137168106

VL - 174

JO - Soil Biology & Biochemistry

JF - Soil Biology & Biochemistry

SN - 0038-0717

M1 - 108789

ER -

ID: 321476248