Impact of elevated pH on succession in the Arctic spring bloom

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Impact of elevated pH on succession in the Arctic spring bloom. / Riisgaard, Karen; Nielsen, Torkel Gissel; Hansen, Per Juel.

In: Marine Ecology - Progress Series, Vol. 530, 2015, p. 63-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Riisgaard, K, Nielsen, TG & Hansen, PJ 2015, 'Impact of elevated pH on succession in the Arctic spring bloom', Marine Ecology - Progress Series, vol. 530, pp. 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11296

APA

Riisgaard, K., Nielsen, T. G., & Hansen, P. J. (2015). Impact of elevated pH on succession in the Arctic spring bloom. Marine Ecology - Progress Series, 530, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11296

Vancouver

Riisgaard K, Nielsen TG, Hansen PJ. Impact of elevated pH on succession in the Arctic spring bloom. Marine Ecology - Progress Series. 2015;530:63-75. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11296

Author

Riisgaard, Karen ; Nielsen, Torkel Gissel ; Hansen, Per Juel. / Impact of elevated pH on succession in the Arctic spring bloom. In: Marine Ecology - Progress Series. 2015 ; Vol. 530. pp. 63-75.

Bibtex

@article{2f0a00a4585446be8b08ba15bae4a190,
title = "Impact of elevated pH on succession in the Arctic spring bloom",
abstract = "The development of pH during the spring bloom of 2011 and 2012 was investigated in Disko Bay, West Greenland. During the spring phytoplankton bloom, pH reached 8.5 at the peak of the bloom and subsequently decreased to 7.5. Microcosm experiments were conducted on natural assemblages sampled at the initiation of the spring bloom each year and pH levels were manipulated in the range of 8.0−9.5 to test the immediate tolerance of Arctic protist plankton to elevated pH under nutrient-limiting (2011) and nutrient-rich conditions (2012). The most pronounced effect of elevated pH was found for heterotrophic protists, whereas phytoplankton proved more robust. Two out of 3 heterotrophic protist species were significantly affected if pH increased above 8.5, and all heterotrophic protists had disappeared at pH 9.5. Based on chl a measurements from the 2 sets of experiments, phytoplankton community growth was significantly reduced at pH 9.5 during nutrient-rich conditions, while pH had little impact on nutrient-limited phytoplankton growth. The results were supported by cell counts which revealed that phytoplankton growth during nutrient-rich conditions was significantly reduced from an average of0.49 d−1 at pH 8.0 to an average of 0.27 d−1 at pH 9.5. In comparison, only 1 out of 4 tested phytoplankton species was significantly affected by elevated pH under nutrient-limited conditions. Sudden pH fluctuations, such as those occurring during phytoplankton blooms, will most likely favour pH- tolerant species, such as diatoms.",
author = "Karen Riisgaard and Nielsen, {Torkel Gissel} and Hansen, {Per Juel}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3354/meps11296",
language = "English",
volume = "530",
pages = "63--75",
journal = "Marine Ecology - Progress Series",
issn = "0171-8630",
publisher = "Inter-Research",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of elevated pH on succession in the Arctic spring bloom

AU - Riisgaard, Karen

AU - Nielsen, Torkel Gissel

AU - Hansen, Per Juel

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The development of pH during the spring bloom of 2011 and 2012 was investigated in Disko Bay, West Greenland. During the spring phytoplankton bloom, pH reached 8.5 at the peak of the bloom and subsequently decreased to 7.5. Microcosm experiments were conducted on natural assemblages sampled at the initiation of the spring bloom each year and pH levels were manipulated in the range of 8.0−9.5 to test the immediate tolerance of Arctic protist plankton to elevated pH under nutrient-limiting (2011) and nutrient-rich conditions (2012). The most pronounced effect of elevated pH was found for heterotrophic protists, whereas phytoplankton proved more robust. Two out of 3 heterotrophic protist species were significantly affected if pH increased above 8.5, and all heterotrophic protists had disappeared at pH 9.5. Based on chl a measurements from the 2 sets of experiments, phytoplankton community growth was significantly reduced at pH 9.5 during nutrient-rich conditions, while pH had little impact on nutrient-limited phytoplankton growth. The results were supported by cell counts which revealed that phytoplankton growth during nutrient-rich conditions was significantly reduced from an average of0.49 d−1 at pH 8.0 to an average of 0.27 d−1 at pH 9.5. In comparison, only 1 out of 4 tested phytoplankton species was significantly affected by elevated pH under nutrient-limited conditions. Sudden pH fluctuations, such as those occurring during phytoplankton blooms, will most likely favour pH- tolerant species, such as diatoms.

AB - The development of pH during the spring bloom of 2011 and 2012 was investigated in Disko Bay, West Greenland. During the spring phytoplankton bloom, pH reached 8.5 at the peak of the bloom and subsequently decreased to 7.5. Microcosm experiments were conducted on natural assemblages sampled at the initiation of the spring bloom each year and pH levels were manipulated in the range of 8.0−9.5 to test the immediate tolerance of Arctic protist plankton to elevated pH under nutrient-limiting (2011) and nutrient-rich conditions (2012). The most pronounced effect of elevated pH was found for heterotrophic protists, whereas phytoplankton proved more robust. Two out of 3 heterotrophic protist species were significantly affected if pH increased above 8.5, and all heterotrophic protists had disappeared at pH 9.5. Based on chl a measurements from the 2 sets of experiments, phytoplankton community growth was significantly reduced at pH 9.5 during nutrient-rich conditions, while pH had little impact on nutrient-limited phytoplankton growth. The results were supported by cell counts which revealed that phytoplankton growth during nutrient-rich conditions was significantly reduced from an average of0.49 d−1 at pH 8.0 to an average of 0.27 d−1 at pH 9.5. In comparison, only 1 out of 4 tested phytoplankton species was significantly affected by elevated pH under nutrient-limited conditions. Sudden pH fluctuations, such as those occurring during phytoplankton blooms, will most likely favour pH- tolerant species, such as diatoms.

U2 - 10.3354/meps11296

DO - 10.3354/meps11296

M3 - Journal article

VL - 530

SP - 63

EP - 75

JO - Marine Ecology - Progress Series

JF - Marine Ecology - Progress Series

SN - 0171-8630

ER -

ID: 135497227