Winters are changing: snow effects on Arctic and alpine tundra ecosystems

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 3.08 MB, PDF document

  • Christian Rixen
  • Toke Thomas Høye
  • Petr Macek
  • Rien Aerts
  • Juha M. Alatalo
  • Jill T. Anderson
  • Pieter A. Arnold
  • Isabel C Barrio
  • Jarle W. Bjerke
  • Mats P. Björkman
  • Daan Blok
  • Gesche Blume-Werry
  • Julia Boike
  • Stef Bokhorst
  • Michele Carbognani
  • Casper T. Christiansen
  • Peter Convey
  • Elisabeth J. Cooper
  • J. Hans C. Cornelissen
  • Stephen J. Coulson
  • Ellen Dorrepaal
  • Sarah C. Elmendorf
  • Cassandra Elphinstone
  • T’ai G.w. Forte
  • Esther R. Frei
  • Sonya R. Geange
  • Friederike Gehrmann
  • Casey Gibson
  • Paul Grogan
  • Aud Helen Halbritter
  • John Harte
  • Gregory H.R. Henry
  • David W. Inouye
  • Rebecca E. Irwin
  • Gus Jespersen
  • Ingibjörg Svala Jónsdóttir
  • Ji Young Jung
  • David H. Klinges
  • Gaku Kudo
  • Juho Lämsä
  • Hanna Lee
  • Jonas J. Lembrechts
  • Joshua Scott Lynn
  • Hjalte M.R. Mann
  • Mikhail Mastepanov
  • Jennifer Morse
  • Isla H. Myers-smith
  • Johan Olofsson
  • Riku Paavola
  • Alessandro Petraglia
  • Gareth K. Phoenix
  • Philipp Semenchuk
  • Matthias B. Siewert
  • Rachel Slatyer
  • Marko J. Spasojevic
  • Katharine Suding
  • Patrick Sullivan
  • Kimberly L. Thompson
  • Maria Väisänen
  • Vigdis Vandvik
  • Susanna Venn
  • Josefine Walz
  • Robert Way
  • Jeffrey M. Welker
  • Sonja Wipf
  • Shengwei Zong
Snow is an important driver of ecosystem processes in cold biomes. Snow accumulation determines ground temperature, light conditions, and moisture availability during winter. It also affects the growing season’s start and end, and plant access to moisture and nutrients. Here, we review the current knowledge of the snow cover’s role for vegetation, plant-animal interactions, permafrost conditions, microbial processes, and biogeochemical cycling. We also compare studies of natural snow gradients with snow experimental manipulation studies to assess time scale difference of these approaches. The number of tundra snow studies has increased considerably in recent years, yet we still lack a comprehensive overview of how altered snow conditions will affect these ecosystems. Specifically, we found a mismatch in the timing of snowmelt when comparing studies of natural snow gradients with snow manipulations. We found that snowmelt timing achieved by snow addition and snow removal manipulations (average 7.9 days advance and 5.5 days delay, respectively) were substantially lower than the temporal variation over natural spatial gradients within a given year (mean range 56 days) or among years (mean range 32 days). Differences between snow study approaches need to be accounted for when projecting snow dynamics and their impact on ecosystems in future climates.
Original languageEnglish
JournalArctic Science
Volume8
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)572–608
Number of pages37
ISSN2368-7460
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

CENPERMOA[2022]

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 309080714