Taxonomy based on limited genomic markers may underestimate species diversity of rockhopper penguins and threaten their conservation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • María José Frugone
  • Theresa L. Cole
  • María Eugenia López
  • Gemma Clucas
  • Pável Matos-Maraví
  • Nicolás A. Lois
  • Pierre Pistorius
  • Francesco Bonadonna
  • Phil Trathan
  • Andrea Polanowski
  • Barbara Wienecke
  • Andrea Raya-Rey
  • Klemens Pütz
  • Antje Steinfurth
  • Ke Bi
  • Cynthia Y. Wang-Claypool
  • Jonathan M. Waters
  • Rauri C. K. Bowie
  • Elie Poulin
  • Juliana A. Vianna

Aim: Delimiting recently diverged species is challenging. During speciation, genetic differentiation may be distributed unevenly across the genome, as different genomic regions can be subject to different selective pressures and evolutionary histories. Reliance on limited numbers of genetic markers that may be underpowered can make species delimitation even more challenging, potentially resulting in taxonomic inconsistencies. Rockhopper penguins of the genus Eudyptes comprise three broadly recognized taxa: northern (E. moseleyi), southern (E. chrysocome) and eastern rockhopper (E. filholi). Their taxonomic status has been controversial for decades, with researchers disagreeing about whether E. chrysocome and E. filholi are distinct species or conspecific. Our goal is to evaluate genome-wide patterns of divergence to evaluate genetic differentiation and species delimitation in rockhopper penguins, and to assess which mechanisms may underlie previous discordance among nuclear versus mitochondrial analyses. Location: Sub-Antarctic and temperate coastal regions of the Southern Hemisphere. Methods: We generated reduced-representation genomic libraries using double digest restriction-site associated DNA (ddRAD) sequencing to evaluate genetic differentiation, contemporary migration rates and admixture among colonies of rockhopper penguins. Results: The extent of genetic differentiation among the three taxa was consistently higher than population-level genetic differentiation found within these and other penguin species. There was no evidence of admixture among the three taxa, suggesting the absence of ongoing gene flow among them. Species delimitation analyses based on molecular data, along with other lines of evidence, provide strong support for the taxonomic distinction of three species of rockhopper penguins. Main conclusions: Our results provide strong support for the existence of three distinct species of rockhopper penguins. The recognition of this taxonomic diversity is crucial for the management and conservation of this widely distributed species group. This study illustrates that widespread dispersive seabird lineages lacking obvious morphological differences may nevertheless have complex evolutionary histories and comprise cryptic species diversity.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDiversity and Distributions
Vol/bind27
Udgave nummer11
Sider (fra-til)2277-2296
Antal sider20
ISSN1366-9516
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
We thank Daly Noll and Alison Cleary for help in the laboratory. We thank Milan Malinsky for useful comments and help with FINERADSTRUCTURE analysis. This study was funded by INACH DT‐11_17 and INACH RT_12–14 grants, FONDECYT projects 1150517, Centro de Regulación del Genoma (CRG) ANID/FONDAP/15200002 and 1151336 CONICYT PIA ACT172065 GAB. PMM was supported by a Czech Science Foundation Junior GAČR grant (GJ20‐18566Y) and the Czech Academy of Sciences PPLZ programme (L200961951), and acknowledges the computational resources provided by the CESNET LM2015042 and the CERIT Scientific Cloud LM2015085. FB was supported by the French Polar Institute Paul‐Emile Victor (IPEV; Prog. 354). We also would like to thank Damien Esquerré and anonymous referees whose comments and suggestions helped to improve this manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Diversity and Distributions published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 281645412