A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells. / Lillestøl, Reidun K; Redder, Peter; Garrett, Roger Antony; Brügger, Kim.

In: Archaea, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2006, p. 59-72.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Lillestøl, RK, Redder, P, Garrett, RA & Brügger, K 2006, 'A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells', Archaea, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 59-72. <http://archaea.ws/archive/pdf/volume2/issue1/2-59.pdf>

APA

Lillestøl, R. K., Redder, P., Garrett, R. A., & Brügger, K. (2006). A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells. Archaea, 2(1), 59-72. http://archaea.ws/archive/pdf/volume2/issue1/2-59.pdf

Vancouver

Lillestøl RK, Redder P, Garrett RA, Brügger K. A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells. Archaea. 2006;2(1):59-72.

Author

Lillestøl, Reidun K ; Redder, Peter ; Garrett, Roger Antony ; Brügger, Kim. / A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells. In: Archaea. 2006 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 59-72.

Bibtex

@article{413cb1906c3711dcbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells",
abstract = "Clusters of regularly spaced direct repeats, separated by unconserved spacer sequences, are ubiquitous in archaeal chromosomes and occur in some plasmids. Some clusters constitute around 1% of chromosomal DNA. Similarly structured clusters, generally smaller, also occur in some bacterial chromosomes. Although early studies implicated these clusters in segregation/partition functions, recent evidence suggests that the spacer sequences derive from extrachromosomal elements, and, primarily, viruses. This has led to the proposal that the clusters provide a defence against viral propagation in cells, and that both the mode of inhibition of viral propagation and the mechanism of adding spacer-repeat units to clusters, are dependent on RNAs transcribed from the clusters. Moreover, the putative inhibitory apparatus (piRNA-based) may be evolutionarily related to the interference RNA systems (siRNA and miRNA), which are common in eukarya. Here, we analyze all the current data on archaeal repeat clusters and provide some new insights into their diverse structures, transcriptional properties and mode of structural development. The results are consistent with larger cluster transcripts being processed at the centers of the repeat sequences and being further trimmed by exonucleases to yield a dominant, intracellular RNA species, which corresponds approximately to the size of a spacer. Furthermore, analysis of the extensive clusters of Sulfolobus solfataricus strains P1 and P2B provides support for the presence of a flanking sequence adjoining a cluster being a prerequisite for the incorporation of new spacer-repeat units, which occurs between the flanking sequence and the cluster. An archaeal database summarizing the data will be maintained at http://dac.molbio.ku.dk/dbs/SRSR/.",
keywords = "Archaea, Base Sequence, DNA, Intergenic, Genome, Archaeal, Molecular Sequence Data, Multigene Family, RNA, Archaeal, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid",
author = "Lillest{\o}l, {Reidun K} and Peter Redder and Garrett, {Roger Antony} and Kim Br{\"u}gger",
note = "Keywords: archaeal genomes, piRNA, plasmids, SRSRCRISPR, viruses.",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "59--72",
journal = "Archaea",
issn = "1472-3646",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells

AU - Lillestøl, Reidun K

AU - Redder, Peter

AU - Garrett, Roger Antony

AU - Brügger, Kim

N1 - Keywords: archaeal genomes, piRNA, plasmids, SRSRCRISPR, viruses.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Clusters of regularly spaced direct repeats, separated by unconserved spacer sequences, are ubiquitous in archaeal chromosomes and occur in some plasmids. Some clusters constitute around 1% of chromosomal DNA. Similarly structured clusters, generally smaller, also occur in some bacterial chromosomes. Although early studies implicated these clusters in segregation/partition functions, recent evidence suggests that the spacer sequences derive from extrachromosomal elements, and, primarily, viruses. This has led to the proposal that the clusters provide a defence against viral propagation in cells, and that both the mode of inhibition of viral propagation and the mechanism of adding spacer-repeat units to clusters, are dependent on RNAs transcribed from the clusters. Moreover, the putative inhibitory apparatus (piRNA-based) may be evolutionarily related to the interference RNA systems (siRNA and miRNA), which are common in eukarya. Here, we analyze all the current data on archaeal repeat clusters and provide some new insights into their diverse structures, transcriptional properties and mode of structural development. The results are consistent with larger cluster transcripts being processed at the centers of the repeat sequences and being further trimmed by exonucleases to yield a dominant, intracellular RNA species, which corresponds approximately to the size of a spacer. Furthermore, analysis of the extensive clusters of Sulfolobus solfataricus strains P1 and P2B provides support for the presence of a flanking sequence adjoining a cluster being a prerequisite for the incorporation of new spacer-repeat units, which occurs between the flanking sequence and the cluster. An archaeal database summarizing the data will be maintained at http://dac.molbio.ku.dk/dbs/SRSR/.

AB - Clusters of regularly spaced direct repeats, separated by unconserved spacer sequences, are ubiquitous in archaeal chromosomes and occur in some plasmids. Some clusters constitute around 1% of chromosomal DNA. Similarly structured clusters, generally smaller, also occur in some bacterial chromosomes. Although early studies implicated these clusters in segregation/partition functions, recent evidence suggests that the spacer sequences derive from extrachromosomal elements, and, primarily, viruses. This has led to the proposal that the clusters provide a defence against viral propagation in cells, and that both the mode of inhibition of viral propagation and the mechanism of adding spacer-repeat units to clusters, are dependent on RNAs transcribed from the clusters. Moreover, the putative inhibitory apparatus (piRNA-based) may be evolutionarily related to the interference RNA systems (siRNA and miRNA), which are common in eukarya. Here, we analyze all the current data on archaeal repeat clusters and provide some new insights into their diverse structures, transcriptional properties and mode of structural development. The results are consistent with larger cluster transcripts being processed at the centers of the repeat sequences and being further trimmed by exonucleases to yield a dominant, intracellular RNA species, which corresponds approximately to the size of a spacer. Furthermore, analysis of the extensive clusters of Sulfolobus solfataricus strains P1 and P2B provides support for the presence of a flanking sequence adjoining a cluster being a prerequisite for the incorporation of new spacer-repeat units, which occurs between the flanking sequence and the cluster. An archaeal database summarizing the data will be maintained at http://dac.molbio.ku.dk/dbs/SRSR/.

KW - Archaea

KW - Base Sequence

KW - DNA, Intergenic

KW - Genome, Archaeal

KW - Molecular Sequence Data

KW - Multigene Family

KW - RNA, Archaeal

KW - Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 16877322

VL - 2

SP - 59

EP - 72

JO - Archaea

JF - Archaea

SN - 1472-3646

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 1098945