Contrasting neurochemical and behavioral profiles reflects stress coping styles but not stress responsiveness in farmed gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Contrasting neurochemical and behavioral profiles reflects stress coping styles but not stress responsiveness in farmed gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). / Höglund, Erik; Moltesen, Maria; Castanheira, Maria Filipa; Thörnqvist, Per-Ove; Silva, Patricia I.M.; Øverli, Øyvind; Martins, Catarina; Winberg, Svante.

I: Physiology and Behavior, Bind 214, 112759, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Höglund, E, Moltesen, M, Castanheira, MF, Thörnqvist, P-O, Silva, PIM, Øverli, Ø, Martins, C & Winberg, S 2020, 'Contrasting neurochemical and behavioral profiles reflects stress coping styles but not stress responsiveness in farmed gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata)', Physiology and Behavior, bind 214, 112759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112759

APA

Höglund, E., Moltesen, M., Castanheira, M. F., Thörnqvist, P-O., Silva, P. I. M., Øverli, Ø., Martins, C., & Winberg, S. (2020). Contrasting neurochemical and behavioral profiles reflects stress coping styles but not stress responsiveness in farmed gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Physiology and Behavior, 214, [112759]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112759

Vancouver

Höglund E, Moltesen M, Castanheira MF, Thörnqvist P-O, Silva PIM, Øverli Ø o.a. Contrasting neurochemical and behavioral profiles reflects stress coping styles but not stress responsiveness in farmed gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Physiology and Behavior. 2020;214. 112759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112759

Author

Höglund, Erik ; Moltesen, Maria ; Castanheira, Maria Filipa ; Thörnqvist, Per-Ove ; Silva, Patricia I.M. ; Øverli, Øyvind ; Martins, Catarina ; Winberg, Svante. / Contrasting neurochemical and behavioral profiles reflects stress coping styles but not stress responsiveness in farmed gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). I: Physiology and Behavior. 2020 ; Bind 214.

Bibtex

@article{e49447e7994944c6b70f3d0dcb4167c8,
title = "Contrasting neurochemical and behavioral profiles reflects stress coping styles but not stress responsiveness in farmed gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata)",
abstract = "In fish, as well as in other vertebrates, contrasting suites of physiological and behavioral traits, or coping styles, are often shown in response to stressors. However, the magnitude of the response (i.e. stress responsiveness) has been suggested to be independent of stress coping style. One central neurotransmitter that has been associated with both stress responsiveness and differences in stress coping styles is serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT). In this study, we investigated to what extent stress responsiveness reflects differences in stress coping, and the potential involvement of the 5-HT system in mediating such differences in farmed Gilthead seabream. Initially, fish were classified as proactive or reactive based on their behavioural response to net restraint. Following 1.5 months, fish classified as proactive still showed a higher number of escape attempts and spent longer time escaping than those classified as reactive. These differences were reflected in a generally higher brain stem 5-HT concentration and a lower telencephalic 5-HT activity, i.e. the ratio of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) to 5-HT, in proactive fish. Independent of stress coping styles, stress responsiveness was reflected in elevated 5-HIAA concentrations and 5-HIAA/5-HT ratios in telencephalon and brain stem together with increased plasma cortisol concentrations at 0.5 and 2 h following the last net restraint. The current results show that 5-HT signaling can reflect different behavioural output to a challenge which are independent of neuroendocrine responses to stress and lend support to the hypothesis that stress coping styles can be independent of stress responsiveness.",
author = "Erik H{\"o}glund and Maria Moltesen and Castanheira, {Maria Filipa} and Per-Ove Th{\"o}rnqvist and Silva, {Patricia I.M.} and {\O}yvind {\O}verli and Catarina Martins and Svante Winberg",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112759",
language = "English",
volume = "214",
journal = "Physiology & Behavior",
issn = "0031-9384",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrasting neurochemical and behavioral profiles reflects stress coping styles but not stress responsiveness in farmed gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata)

AU - Höglund, Erik

AU - Moltesen, Maria

AU - Castanheira, Maria Filipa

AU - Thörnqvist, Per-Ove

AU - Silva, Patricia I.M.

AU - Øverli, Øyvind

AU - Martins, Catarina

AU - Winberg, Svante

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In fish, as well as in other vertebrates, contrasting suites of physiological and behavioral traits, or coping styles, are often shown in response to stressors. However, the magnitude of the response (i.e. stress responsiveness) has been suggested to be independent of stress coping style. One central neurotransmitter that has been associated with both stress responsiveness and differences in stress coping styles is serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT). In this study, we investigated to what extent stress responsiveness reflects differences in stress coping, and the potential involvement of the 5-HT system in mediating such differences in farmed Gilthead seabream. Initially, fish were classified as proactive or reactive based on their behavioural response to net restraint. Following 1.5 months, fish classified as proactive still showed a higher number of escape attempts and spent longer time escaping than those classified as reactive. These differences were reflected in a generally higher brain stem 5-HT concentration and a lower telencephalic 5-HT activity, i.e. the ratio of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) to 5-HT, in proactive fish. Independent of stress coping styles, stress responsiveness was reflected in elevated 5-HIAA concentrations and 5-HIAA/5-HT ratios in telencephalon and brain stem together with increased plasma cortisol concentrations at 0.5 and 2 h following the last net restraint. The current results show that 5-HT signaling can reflect different behavioural output to a challenge which are independent of neuroendocrine responses to stress and lend support to the hypothesis that stress coping styles can be independent of stress responsiveness.

AB - In fish, as well as in other vertebrates, contrasting suites of physiological and behavioral traits, or coping styles, are often shown in response to stressors. However, the magnitude of the response (i.e. stress responsiveness) has been suggested to be independent of stress coping style. One central neurotransmitter that has been associated with both stress responsiveness and differences in stress coping styles is serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT). In this study, we investigated to what extent stress responsiveness reflects differences in stress coping, and the potential involvement of the 5-HT system in mediating such differences in farmed Gilthead seabream. Initially, fish were classified as proactive or reactive based on their behavioural response to net restraint. Following 1.5 months, fish classified as proactive still showed a higher number of escape attempts and spent longer time escaping than those classified as reactive. These differences were reflected in a generally higher brain stem 5-HT concentration and a lower telencephalic 5-HT activity, i.e. the ratio of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) to 5-HT, in proactive fish. Independent of stress coping styles, stress responsiveness was reflected in elevated 5-HIAA concentrations and 5-HIAA/5-HT ratios in telencephalon and brain stem together with increased plasma cortisol concentrations at 0.5 and 2 h following the last net restraint. The current results show that 5-HT signaling can reflect different behavioural output to a challenge which are independent of neuroendocrine responses to stress and lend support to the hypothesis that stress coping styles can be independent of stress responsiveness.

U2 - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112759

DO - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112759

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31785269

AN - SCOPUS:85076171623

VL - 214

JO - Physiology & Behavior

JF - Physiology & Behavior

SN - 0031-9384

M1 - 112759

ER -

ID: 237842850