Origins: It takes a well rooted trunk to bear a tree - reductionist models of divergent evolution and further aspects of reality

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskning

Standard

Origins : It takes a well rooted trunk to bear a tree - reductionist models of divergent evolution and further aspects of reality. / Egel, Richard.

Untangling Molecular Biodiversity: Explaining Unity and Diversity Principles of Organization with Molecular Structure and Evolutionary Genomics. red. / Gustavo Caetano-Anollés. World Scientific, 2020. s. 223-282.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskning

Harvard

Egel, R 2020, Origins: It takes a well rooted trunk to bear a tree - reductionist models of divergent evolution and further aspects of reality. i G Caetano-Anollés (red.), Untangling Molecular Biodiversity: Explaining Unity and Diversity Principles of Organization with Molecular Structure and Evolutionary Genomics. World Scientific, s. 223-282. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814656627_0005

APA

Egel, R. (2020). Origins: It takes a well rooted trunk to bear a tree - reductionist models of divergent evolution and further aspects of reality. I G. Caetano-Anollés (red.), Untangling Molecular Biodiversity: Explaining Unity and Diversity Principles of Organization with Molecular Structure and Evolutionary Genomics (s. 223-282). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814656627_0005

Vancouver

Egel R. Origins: It takes a well rooted trunk to bear a tree - reductionist models of divergent evolution and further aspects of reality. I Caetano-Anollés G, red., Untangling Molecular Biodiversity: Explaining Unity and Diversity Principles of Organization with Molecular Structure and Evolutionary Genomics. World Scientific. 2020. s. 223-282 https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814656627_0005

Author

Egel, Richard. / Origins : It takes a well rooted trunk to bear a tree - reductionist models of divergent evolution and further aspects of reality. Untangling Molecular Biodiversity: Explaining Unity and Diversity Principles of Organization with Molecular Structure and Evolutionary Genomics. red. / Gustavo Caetano-Anollés. World Scientific, 2020. s. 223-282

Bibtex

@inbook{386b2f06e158411db7a34ed16d1f4f97,
title = "Origins: It takes a well rooted trunk to bear a tree - reductionist models of divergent evolution and further aspects of reality",
abstract = "In this visionary and rather personal essay I try to untangle certain ambiguities about tentative origins of molecular biodiversity. A “leitmotif” in my considerations will be the tree-like dendrograms encountered in various evolutionary settings from Darwinian species and replicating genes to the intricate folding patterns of protein domains. These patterns are powerful aids to comprehending present biological diversity, but looking back in evolutionary time may run into difficulties of inconclusive generalization. Extrapolating backward toward the bottom node of tree-like bifurcations, one inevitably ends up in some singularity, where the comparison-based algorithm to construct the tree is virtually stripped for its basic rationale. This is a serious conceptual problem. The following aspects are scrutinized and discussed in this regard for their likely evolutionary beginnings: Darwinian speciation, cells, genomes, fold families of protein domains, and replicating RNA molecules. In some of these examples, the principle that generates the branching pattern loses its predictive power for looking deeper yet, i.e. below the earliest bifurcation events that started to define the diversifying tree. Other and perhaps unthought-of principles may allow escape from such a conceptual impasse. To really comprehend those evolutionary phase transitions we need plausible links to thermodynamically sound reactions in large numbers, and collective coevolution of multiple components should also be considered. To clearly define a common frame of reference, I do not start with Darwin, who only had prescient yet limited access to the basic mechanisms beneath the macroscopic appearance of biodiversity at large, but rather from the Woesean perspective of three fundamentally different superkingdoms (domains or phylodomains) in the universal organismal tree of – presently apparent – life.",
author = "Richard Egel",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1142/9789814656627_0005",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-981-4656-61-0",
pages = "223--282",
editor = "Gustavo Caetano-Anoll{\'e}s",
booktitle = "Untangling Molecular Biodiversity",
publisher = "World Scientific",
address = "United States",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Origins

T2 - It takes a well rooted trunk to bear a tree - reductionist models of divergent evolution and further aspects of reality

AU - Egel, Richard

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In this visionary and rather personal essay I try to untangle certain ambiguities about tentative origins of molecular biodiversity. A “leitmotif” in my considerations will be the tree-like dendrograms encountered in various evolutionary settings from Darwinian species and replicating genes to the intricate folding patterns of protein domains. These patterns are powerful aids to comprehending present biological diversity, but looking back in evolutionary time may run into difficulties of inconclusive generalization. Extrapolating backward toward the bottom node of tree-like bifurcations, one inevitably ends up in some singularity, where the comparison-based algorithm to construct the tree is virtually stripped for its basic rationale. This is a serious conceptual problem. The following aspects are scrutinized and discussed in this regard for their likely evolutionary beginnings: Darwinian speciation, cells, genomes, fold families of protein domains, and replicating RNA molecules. In some of these examples, the principle that generates the branching pattern loses its predictive power for looking deeper yet, i.e. below the earliest bifurcation events that started to define the diversifying tree. Other and perhaps unthought-of principles may allow escape from such a conceptual impasse. To really comprehend those evolutionary phase transitions we need plausible links to thermodynamically sound reactions in large numbers, and collective coevolution of multiple components should also be considered. To clearly define a common frame of reference, I do not start with Darwin, who only had prescient yet limited access to the basic mechanisms beneath the macroscopic appearance of biodiversity at large, but rather from the Woesean perspective of three fundamentally different superkingdoms (domains or phylodomains) in the universal organismal tree of – presently apparent – life.

AB - In this visionary and rather personal essay I try to untangle certain ambiguities about tentative origins of molecular biodiversity. A “leitmotif” in my considerations will be the tree-like dendrograms encountered in various evolutionary settings from Darwinian species and replicating genes to the intricate folding patterns of protein domains. These patterns are powerful aids to comprehending present biological diversity, but looking back in evolutionary time may run into difficulties of inconclusive generalization. Extrapolating backward toward the bottom node of tree-like bifurcations, one inevitably ends up in some singularity, where the comparison-based algorithm to construct the tree is virtually stripped for its basic rationale. This is a serious conceptual problem. The following aspects are scrutinized and discussed in this regard for their likely evolutionary beginnings: Darwinian speciation, cells, genomes, fold families of protein domains, and replicating RNA molecules. In some of these examples, the principle that generates the branching pattern loses its predictive power for looking deeper yet, i.e. below the earliest bifurcation events that started to define the diversifying tree. Other and perhaps unthought-of principles may allow escape from such a conceptual impasse. To really comprehend those evolutionary phase transitions we need plausible links to thermodynamically sound reactions in large numbers, and collective coevolution of multiple components should also be considered. To clearly define a common frame of reference, I do not start with Darwin, who only had prescient yet limited access to the basic mechanisms beneath the macroscopic appearance of biodiversity at large, but rather from the Woesean perspective of three fundamentally different superkingdoms (domains or phylodomains) in the universal organismal tree of – presently apparent – life.

U2 - 10.1142/9789814656627_0005

DO - 10.1142/9789814656627_0005

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-981-4656-61-0

SP - 223

EP - 282

BT - Untangling Molecular Biodiversity

A2 - Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo

PB - World Scientific

ER -

ID: 257419837