Origins: It takes a well rooted trunk to bear a tree - reductionist models of divergent evolution and further aspects of reality
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning
Standard
Origins : It takes a well rooted trunk to bear a tree - reductionist models of divergent evolution and further aspects of reality. / Egel, Richard.
Untangling Molecular Biodiversity: Explaining Unity and Diversity Principles of Organization with Molecular Structure and Evolutionary Genomics. red. / Gustavo Caetano-Anollés. World Scientific, 2020. s. 223-282.Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Origins
T2 - It takes a well rooted trunk to bear a tree - reductionist models of divergent evolution and further aspects of reality
AU - Egel, Richard
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In this visionary and rather personal essay I try to untangle certain ambiguities about tentative origins of molecular biodiversity. A “leitmotif” in my considerations will be the tree-like dendrograms encountered in various evolutionary settings from Darwinian species and replicating genes to the intricate folding patterns of protein domains. These patterns are powerful aids to comprehending present biological diversity, but looking back in evolutionary time may run into difficulties of inconclusive generalization. Extrapolating backward toward the bottom node of tree-like bifurcations, one inevitably ends up in some singularity, where the comparison-based algorithm to construct the tree is virtually stripped for its basic rationale. This is a serious conceptual problem. The following aspects are scrutinized and discussed in this regard for their likely evolutionary beginnings: Darwinian speciation, cells, genomes, fold families of protein domains, and replicating RNA molecules. In some of these examples, the principle that generates the branching pattern loses its predictive power for looking deeper yet, i.e. below the earliest bifurcation events that started to define the diversifying tree. Other and perhaps unthought-of principles may allow escape from such a conceptual impasse. To really comprehend those evolutionary phase transitions we need plausible links to thermodynamically sound reactions in large numbers, and collective coevolution of multiple components should also be considered. To clearly define a common frame of reference, I do not start with Darwin, who only had prescient yet limited access to the basic mechanisms beneath the macroscopic appearance of biodiversity at large, but rather from the Woesean perspective of three fundamentally different superkingdoms (domains or phylodomains) in the universal organismal tree of – presently apparent – life.
AB - In this visionary and rather personal essay I try to untangle certain ambiguities about tentative origins of molecular biodiversity. A “leitmotif” in my considerations will be the tree-like dendrograms encountered in various evolutionary settings from Darwinian species and replicating genes to the intricate folding patterns of protein domains. These patterns are powerful aids to comprehending present biological diversity, but looking back in evolutionary time may run into difficulties of inconclusive generalization. Extrapolating backward toward the bottom node of tree-like bifurcations, one inevitably ends up in some singularity, where the comparison-based algorithm to construct the tree is virtually stripped for its basic rationale. This is a serious conceptual problem. The following aspects are scrutinized and discussed in this regard for their likely evolutionary beginnings: Darwinian speciation, cells, genomes, fold families of protein domains, and replicating RNA molecules. In some of these examples, the principle that generates the branching pattern loses its predictive power for looking deeper yet, i.e. below the earliest bifurcation events that started to define the diversifying tree. Other and perhaps unthought-of principles may allow escape from such a conceptual impasse. To really comprehend those evolutionary phase transitions we need plausible links to thermodynamically sound reactions in large numbers, and collective coevolution of multiple components should also be considered. To clearly define a common frame of reference, I do not start with Darwin, who only had prescient yet limited access to the basic mechanisms beneath the macroscopic appearance of biodiversity at large, but rather from the Woesean perspective of three fundamentally different superkingdoms (domains or phylodomains) in the universal organismal tree of – presently apparent – life.
U2 - 10.1142/9789814656627_0005
DO - 10.1142/9789814656627_0005
M3 - Book chapter
SN - 978-981-4656-61-0
SP - 223
EP - 282
BT - Untangling Molecular Biodiversity
A2 - Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo
PB - World Scientific
ER -
ID: 257419837