Systematic review of machine learning for diagnosis and prognosis in dermatology
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Systematic review of machine learning for diagnosis and prognosis in dermatology. / Thomsen, Kenneth; Iversen, Lars; Titlestad, Therese Louise; Winther, Ole.
I: Journal of Dermatological Treatment, Bind 31, Nr. 5, 2020, s. 496-510.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review of machine learning for diagnosis and prognosis in dermatology
AU - Thomsen, Kenneth
AU - Iversen, Lars
AU - Titlestad, Therese Louise
AU - Winther, Ole
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Software systems using artificial intelligence for medical purposes have been developed in recent years. The success of deep neural networks (DNN) in 2012 in the image recognition challenge ImageNet LSVRC 2010 fueled expectations of the potential for using such systems in dermatology. Objective: To evaluate the ways in which machine learning has been utilized in dermatology to date and provide an overview of the findings in current literature on the subject. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of existing literature, identifying the literature through a systematic search of the PubMed database. Two doctors assessed screening and eligibility with respect to pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: A total of 2175 publications were identified, and 64 publications were included. We identified eight major categories where machine learning tools were tested in dermatology. Most systems involved image recognition tools that were primarily aimed at binary classification of malignant melanoma (MM). Short system descriptions and results of all included systems are presented in tables. Conclusions: We present a complete overview of artificial intelligence implemented in dermatology. Impressive outcomes were reported in all of the identified eight categories, but head-to-head comparison proved difficult. The many areas of dermatology where we identified machine learning tools indicate the diversity of machine learning.
AB - Background: Software systems using artificial intelligence for medical purposes have been developed in recent years. The success of deep neural networks (DNN) in 2012 in the image recognition challenge ImageNet LSVRC 2010 fueled expectations of the potential for using such systems in dermatology. Objective: To evaluate the ways in which machine learning has been utilized in dermatology to date and provide an overview of the findings in current literature on the subject. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of existing literature, identifying the literature through a systematic search of the PubMed database. Two doctors assessed screening and eligibility with respect to pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: A total of 2175 publications were identified, and 64 publications were included. We identified eight major categories where machine learning tools were tested in dermatology. Most systems involved image recognition tools that were primarily aimed at binary classification of malignant melanoma (MM). Short system descriptions and results of all included systems are presented in tables. Conclusions: We present a complete overview of artificial intelligence implemented in dermatology. Impressive outcomes were reported in all of the identified eight categories, but head-to-head comparison proved difficult. The many areas of dermatology where we identified machine learning tools indicate the diversity of machine learning.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - computer assisted diagnostics
KW - deep neural network
KW - Dermatology
U2 - 10.1080/09546634.2019.1682500
DO - 10.1080/09546634.2019.1682500
M3 - Review
C2 - 31625775
AN - SCOPUS:85074770033
VL - 31
SP - 496
EP - 510
JO - Journal of Dermatological Treatment
JF - Journal of Dermatological Treatment
SN - 0954-6634
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 230793349