AutoCNV: a semiautomatic CNV interpretation system based on the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen Technical Standards for CNVs
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
AutoCNV : a semiautomatic CNV interpretation system based on the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen Technical Standards for CNVs. / Fan, Chunna; Wang, Zhonghua; Sun, Yan; Sun, Jun; Liu, Xi; Kang, Licheng; Xu, Yingshuo; Yang, Manqiu; Dai, Wentao; Song, Lijie; Wei, Xiaoming; Xiang, Jiale; Huang, Hui; Zhou, Meizhen; Zeng, Fanwei; Huang, Lin; Xu, Zhengfeng; Peng, Zhiyu.
In: BMC Genomics, Vol. 22, 721, 2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - AutoCNV
T2 - a semiautomatic CNV interpretation system based on the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen Technical Standards for CNVs
AU - Fan, Chunna
AU - Wang, Zhonghua
AU - Sun, Yan
AU - Sun, Jun
AU - Liu, Xi
AU - Kang, Licheng
AU - Xu, Yingshuo
AU - Yang, Manqiu
AU - Dai, Wentao
AU - Song, Lijie
AU - Wei, Xiaoming
AU - Xiang, Jiale
AU - Huang, Hui
AU - Zhou, Meizhen
AU - Zeng, Fanwei
AU - Huang, Lin
AU - Xu, Zhengfeng
AU - Peng, Zhiyu
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) presented technical standards for interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants in 2019 (the standards). Although ClinGen developed a web-based CNV classification calculator based on scoring metrics, it can only track and tally points that have been assigned based on observed evidence. Here, we developed AutoCNV (a semiautomatic automated CNV interpretation system) based on the standards, which can automatically generate predictions on 18 and 16 criteria for copy number loss and gain, respectively. Results: We assessed the performance of AutoCNV using 72 CNVs evaluated by external independent reviewers and 20 illustrative case examples. Using AutoCNV, it showed that 100 % (72/72) and 95 % (19/20) of CNVs were consistent with the reviewers’ and ClinGen-verified classifications, respectively. AutoCNV only required an average of less than 5 milliseconds to obtain the result for one CNV with automated scoring. We also applied AutoCNV for the interpretation of CNVs from the ClinVar database and the dbVar database. We also developed a web-based version of AutoCNV (wAutoCNV). Conclusions: AutoCNV may serve to assist users in conducting in-depth CNV interpretation, to accelerate and facilitate the interpretation process of CNVs and to improve the consistency and reliability of CNV interpretation.
AB - Background: The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) presented technical standards for interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants in 2019 (the standards). Although ClinGen developed a web-based CNV classification calculator based on scoring metrics, it can only track and tally points that have been assigned based on observed evidence. Here, we developed AutoCNV (a semiautomatic automated CNV interpretation system) based on the standards, which can automatically generate predictions on 18 and 16 criteria for copy number loss and gain, respectively. Results: We assessed the performance of AutoCNV using 72 CNVs evaluated by external independent reviewers and 20 illustrative case examples. Using AutoCNV, it showed that 100 % (72/72) and 95 % (19/20) of CNVs were consistent with the reviewers’ and ClinGen-verified classifications, respectively. AutoCNV only required an average of less than 5 milliseconds to obtain the result for one CNV with automated scoring. We also applied AutoCNV for the interpretation of CNVs from the ClinVar database and the dbVar database. We also developed a web-based version of AutoCNV (wAutoCNV). Conclusions: AutoCNV may serve to assist users in conducting in-depth CNV interpretation, to accelerate and facilitate the interpretation process of CNVs and to improve the consistency and reliability of CNV interpretation.
KW - AutoCNV
KW - CNV classification
KW - CNV interpretation
KW - Scoring
U2 - 10.1186/s12864-021-08011-4
DO - 10.1186/s12864-021-08011-4
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34615484
AN - SCOPUS:85116441374
VL - 22
JO - BMC Genomics
JF - BMC Genomics
SN - 1471-2164
M1 - 721
ER -
ID: 283126759