Biogeographic congruence in the south Pacific

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Biogeographic congruence in the south Pacific. / Seberg, Ole.

In: Australian Systematic Botany, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1991, p. 127-36.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Seberg, O 1991, 'Biogeographic congruence in the south Pacific', Australian Systematic Botany, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 127-36. https://doi.org/10.1071/SB9910127

APA

Seberg, O. (1991). Biogeographic congruence in the south Pacific. Australian Systematic Botany, 4(1), 127-36. https://doi.org/10.1071/SB9910127

Vancouver

Seberg O. Biogeographic congruence in the south Pacific. Australian Systematic Botany. 1991;4(1):127-36. https://doi.org/10.1071/SB9910127

Author

Seberg, Ole. / Biogeographic congruence in the south Pacific. In: Australian Systematic Botany. 1991 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 127-36.

Bibtex

@article{85eb94f074d011dbbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "Biogeographic congruence in the south Pacific",
abstract = "Ever since J. D. Hooker's famous 'Introductory Essay' to Flora NOVE-Zelandise, a classical problem in biogeography has been to give a casual explanation of southern hemisphere distribution patterns. An attempt is made to see whether the cladograms for the circum-Pacific areas (South America, New Zealand, Tasmania and Australia) are congruent. The area cladograms are derived from Nothofagus (Fagacae), Embothriinae (Protaceae), Oreobolus (Cyperaceae), Cyttaria (Helotiales) and Eriococcidae (Homoptera). The resulting general area cladogram showing southern South America as the sister-area to New Zealand, south-eastern Australia and Tasmania, and Tasmania plus south-eastern Australia as sister-areas to New Zealand are compared with different geological hypotheses for the area. The biological area cladogram is shown to be congruent with widely different geological hypotheses.",
author = "Ole Seberg",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1071/SB9910127",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "127--36",
journal = "Australian Journal of Botany",
issn = "0067-1924",
publisher = "C S I R O Publishing",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biogeographic congruence in the south Pacific

AU - Seberg, Ole

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Ever since J. D. Hooker's famous 'Introductory Essay' to Flora NOVE-Zelandise, a classical problem in biogeography has been to give a casual explanation of southern hemisphere distribution patterns. An attempt is made to see whether the cladograms for the circum-Pacific areas (South America, New Zealand, Tasmania and Australia) are congruent. The area cladograms are derived from Nothofagus (Fagacae), Embothriinae (Protaceae), Oreobolus (Cyperaceae), Cyttaria (Helotiales) and Eriococcidae (Homoptera). The resulting general area cladogram showing southern South America as the sister-area to New Zealand, south-eastern Australia and Tasmania, and Tasmania plus south-eastern Australia as sister-areas to New Zealand are compared with different geological hypotheses for the area. The biological area cladogram is shown to be congruent with widely different geological hypotheses.

AB - Ever since J. D. Hooker's famous 'Introductory Essay' to Flora NOVE-Zelandise, a classical problem in biogeography has been to give a casual explanation of southern hemisphere distribution patterns. An attempt is made to see whether the cladograms for the circum-Pacific areas (South America, New Zealand, Tasmania and Australia) are congruent. The area cladograms are derived from Nothofagus (Fagacae), Embothriinae (Protaceae), Oreobolus (Cyperaceae), Cyttaria (Helotiales) and Eriococcidae (Homoptera). The resulting general area cladogram showing southern South America as the sister-area to New Zealand, south-eastern Australia and Tasmania, and Tasmania plus south-eastern Australia as sister-areas to New Zealand are compared with different geological hypotheses for the area. The biological area cladogram is shown to be congruent with widely different geological hypotheses.

U2 - 10.1071/SB9910127

DO - 10.1071/SB9910127

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 127

EP - 136

JO - Australian Journal of Botany

JF - Australian Journal of Botany

SN - 0067-1924

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 296003