High nutrient loads hinder successful restoration of natural habitats in freshwater wetlands

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

High nutrient loads hinder successful restoration of natural habitats in freshwater wetlands. / Moeslund, Jesper E.; Andersen, Dagmar K.; Brunbjerg, Ane K.; Bruun, Hans H.; Fløjgaard, Camilla; McQueen, Sebastian N.; Nygaard, Bettina; Ejrnæs, Rasmus.

In: Restoration Ecology, Vol. 31, No. 7, e13796, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Moeslund, JE, Andersen, DK, Brunbjerg, AK, Bruun, HH, Fløjgaard, C, McQueen, SN, Nygaard, B & Ejrnæs, R 2023, 'High nutrient loads hinder successful restoration of natural habitats in freshwater wetlands', Restoration Ecology, vol. 31, no. 7, e13796. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13796

APA

Moeslund, J. E., Andersen, D. K., Brunbjerg, A. K., Bruun, H. H., Fløjgaard, C., McQueen, S. N., Nygaard, B., & Ejrnæs, R. (2023). High nutrient loads hinder successful restoration of natural habitats in freshwater wetlands. Restoration Ecology, 31(7), [e13796]. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13796

Vancouver

Moeslund JE, Andersen DK, Brunbjerg AK, Bruun HH, Fløjgaard C, McQueen SN et al. High nutrient loads hinder successful restoration of natural habitats in freshwater wetlands. Restoration Ecology. 2023;31(7). e13796. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13796

Author

Moeslund, Jesper E. ; Andersen, Dagmar K. ; Brunbjerg, Ane K. ; Bruun, Hans H. ; Fløjgaard, Camilla ; McQueen, Sebastian N. ; Nygaard, Bettina ; Ejrnæs, Rasmus. / High nutrient loads hinder successful restoration of natural habitats in freshwater wetlands. In: Restoration Ecology. 2023 ; Vol. 31, No. 7.

Bibtex

@article{c1d4ce14d7314d0998b015e870e8098e,
title = "High nutrient loads hinder successful restoration of natural habitats in freshwater wetlands",
abstract = "Restoration of natural processes in ecosystems is key to mitigate the biodiversity crisis. Here, we evaluate 20 Danish stream-valley restoration projects—mainly by rewetting—in terms of successful restoration of natural wetland habitats. We used quadratic discriminant analysis and generalized linear models to compare 80 vegetation plots from the restoration projects with >60,000 natural or semi-natural wetland reference plots. We modeled the influence of time since restoration, grazing, rewetting, and nutrient availability on (1) the probability that study plots belong to natural habitats and (2) their richness of high-quality-habitat indicator species. The probability of a restored wetland having developed into a natural wetland habitat—such as an alkaline fen—was generally below 10%. Also, we found only half as many indicator species in restored wetlands than in reference wetlands and we demonstrated that the number of characteristic alkaline fen species did not deviate from what could be expected under the prevailing nutrient conditions. We found a negative effect of soil nutrient availability on the number of high-quality-habitat indicator species and the lowest probability of plots being natural wetlands in the most nutrient rich plots. The effect of grazing was only positive in the first years after restoration and only in the most nutrient rich plots, while the effect of rewetting sites to historical hydrological conditions was generally negative. Our findings suggest that unnaturally high nutrient availability is probably the core limiting factor for successful restoration of natural wetlands and their associated plant diversity.",
keywords = "alkaline fens, eutrophication, grazing, hydrology, indicator species, mires, rewetting",
author = "Moeslund, {Jesper E.} and Andersen, {Dagmar K.} and Brunbjerg, {Ane K.} and Bruun, {Hans H.} and Camilla Fl{\o}jgaard and McQueen, {Sebastian N.} and Bettina Nygaard and Rasmus Ejrn{\ae}s",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/rec.13796",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
journal = "Restoration Ecology",
issn = "1061-2971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - High nutrient loads hinder successful restoration of natural habitats in freshwater wetlands

AU - Moeslund, Jesper E.

AU - Andersen, Dagmar K.

AU - Brunbjerg, Ane K.

AU - Bruun, Hans H.

AU - Fløjgaard, Camilla

AU - McQueen, Sebastian N.

AU - Nygaard, Bettina

AU - Ejrnæs, Rasmus

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Restoration of natural processes in ecosystems is key to mitigate the biodiversity crisis. Here, we evaluate 20 Danish stream-valley restoration projects—mainly by rewetting—in terms of successful restoration of natural wetland habitats. We used quadratic discriminant analysis and generalized linear models to compare 80 vegetation plots from the restoration projects with >60,000 natural or semi-natural wetland reference plots. We modeled the influence of time since restoration, grazing, rewetting, and nutrient availability on (1) the probability that study plots belong to natural habitats and (2) their richness of high-quality-habitat indicator species. The probability of a restored wetland having developed into a natural wetland habitat—such as an alkaline fen—was generally below 10%. Also, we found only half as many indicator species in restored wetlands than in reference wetlands and we demonstrated that the number of characteristic alkaline fen species did not deviate from what could be expected under the prevailing nutrient conditions. We found a negative effect of soil nutrient availability on the number of high-quality-habitat indicator species and the lowest probability of plots being natural wetlands in the most nutrient rich plots. The effect of grazing was only positive in the first years after restoration and only in the most nutrient rich plots, while the effect of rewetting sites to historical hydrological conditions was generally negative. Our findings suggest that unnaturally high nutrient availability is probably the core limiting factor for successful restoration of natural wetlands and their associated plant diversity.

AB - Restoration of natural processes in ecosystems is key to mitigate the biodiversity crisis. Here, we evaluate 20 Danish stream-valley restoration projects—mainly by rewetting—in terms of successful restoration of natural wetland habitats. We used quadratic discriminant analysis and generalized linear models to compare 80 vegetation plots from the restoration projects with >60,000 natural or semi-natural wetland reference plots. We modeled the influence of time since restoration, grazing, rewetting, and nutrient availability on (1) the probability that study plots belong to natural habitats and (2) their richness of high-quality-habitat indicator species. The probability of a restored wetland having developed into a natural wetland habitat—such as an alkaline fen—was generally below 10%. Also, we found only half as many indicator species in restored wetlands than in reference wetlands and we demonstrated that the number of characteristic alkaline fen species did not deviate from what could be expected under the prevailing nutrient conditions. We found a negative effect of soil nutrient availability on the number of high-quality-habitat indicator species and the lowest probability of plots being natural wetlands in the most nutrient rich plots. The effect of grazing was only positive in the first years after restoration and only in the most nutrient rich plots, while the effect of rewetting sites to historical hydrological conditions was generally negative. Our findings suggest that unnaturally high nutrient availability is probably the core limiting factor for successful restoration of natural wetlands and their associated plant diversity.

KW - alkaline fens

KW - eutrophication

KW - grazing

KW - hydrology

KW - indicator species

KW - mires

KW - rewetting

U2 - 10.1111/rec.13796

DO - 10.1111/rec.13796

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85139867186

VL - 31

JO - Restoration Ecology

JF - Restoration Ecology

SN - 1061-2971

IS - 7

M1 - e13796

ER -

ID: 323968233