Informing the SWAT model with remote sensing detected vegetation phenology for improved modeling of ecohydrological processes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Informing the SWAT model with remote sensing detected vegetation phenology for improved modeling of ecohydrological processes. / Chen, Shouzhi; Fu, Yongshuo H.; Wu, Zhaofei; Hao, Fanghua; Hao, Zengchao; Guo, Yahui; Geng, Xiaojun; Li, Xiaoyan; Zhang, Xuan; Tang, Jing; Singh, Vijay P.; Zhang, Xuesong.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 616, 128817, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Chen, S, Fu, YH, Wu, Z, Hao, F, Hao, Z, Guo, Y, Geng, X, Li, X, Zhang, X, Tang, J, Singh, VP & Zhang, X 2023, 'Informing the SWAT model with remote sensing detected vegetation phenology for improved modeling of ecohydrological processes', Journal of Hydrology, vol. 616, 128817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128817

APA

Chen, S., Fu, Y. H., Wu, Z., Hao, F., Hao, Z., Guo, Y., Geng, X., Li, X., Zhang, X., Tang, J., Singh, V. P., & Zhang, X. (2023). Informing the SWAT model with remote sensing detected vegetation phenology for improved modeling of ecohydrological processes. Journal of Hydrology, 616, [128817]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128817

Vancouver

Chen S, Fu YH, Wu Z, Hao F, Hao Z, Guo Y et al. Informing the SWAT model with remote sensing detected vegetation phenology for improved modeling of ecohydrological processes. Journal of Hydrology. 2023;616. 128817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128817

Author

Chen, Shouzhi ; Fu, Yongshuo H. ; Wu, Zhaofei ; Hao, Fanghua ; Hao, Zengchao ; Guo, Yahui ; Geng, Xiaojun ; Li, Xiaoyan ; Zhang, Xuan ; Tang, Jing ; Singh, Vijay P. ; Zhang, Xuesong. / Informing the SWAT model with remote sensing detected vegetation phenology for improved modeling of ecohydrological processes. In: Journal of Hydrology. 2023 ; Vol. 616.

Bibtex

@article{e8f9a8cdf50349f69aae4bb793eff846,
title = "Informing the SWAT model with remote sensing detected vegetation phenology for improved modeling of ecohydrological processes",
abstract = "The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model has been widely applied for simulating the water cycle and quantifying the influence of climate change and anthropogenic activities on hydrological processes. A major uncertainty of SWAT stems from the poor representation of vegetation dynamics due to the use of a simplistic vegetation growth and development module. Using long-term remote sensing-based phenological data, the SWAT model's vegetation module was improved by adding a dynamic growth start date and the dynamic heat requirement for vegetation growth rather than using constant values. The new SWAT model was verified in the Han River basin, China, and found its performance was much improved in comparison with that of the original SWAT model. Specifically, the accuracy of the leaf area index (LAI) simulation improved notably (coefficient of determination (R2) increased by 0.193, Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) increased by 0.846, and percent bias decreased by 42.18 %), and that of runoff simulation improved modestly (R2 increased by 0.05 and NSE was similar). Additionally, it is found that the original SWAT model substantially underestimated evapotranspiration (Penman-Monteith method) in comparison with the new SWAT model (65.09 mm (or 22.17 %) for forests, 92.27 mm (or 32 %) for orchards, and 96.16 mm (or 36.4 %) for farmland), primarily due to the inaccurate representation of LAI dynamics. Our results suggest that an accurate representation of phenological dates in the vegetation growth module is important for improving the SWAT model performance in terms of estimating terrestrial water and energy balance.",
keywords = "LAI simulation, Runoff, SWAT modification, Vegetation phenology",
author = "Shouzhi Chen and Fu, {Yongshuo H.} and Zhaofei Wu and Fanghua Hao and Zengchao Hao and Yahui Guo and Xiaojun Geng and Xiaoyan Li and Xuan Zhang and Jing Tang and Singh, {Vijay P.} and Xuesong Zhang",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128817",
language = "English",
volume = "616",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informing the SWAT model with remote sensing detected vegetation phenology for improved modeling of ecohydrological processes

AU - Chen, Shouzhi

AU - Fu, Yongshuo H.

AU - Wu, Zhaofei

AU - Hao, Fanghua

AU - Hao, Zengchao

AU - Guo, Yahui

AU - Geng, Xiaojun

AU - Li, Xiaoyan

AU - Zhang, Xuan

AU - Tang, Jing

AU - Singh, Vijay P.

AU - Zhang, Xuesong

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model has been widely applied for simulating the water cycle and quantifying the influence of climate change and anthropogenic activities on hydrological processes. A major uncertainty of SWAT stems from the poor representation of vegetation dynamics due to the use of a simplistic vegetation growth and development module. Using long-term remote sensing-based phenological data, the SWAT model's vegetation module was improved by adding a dynamic growth start date and the dynamic heat requirement for vegetation growth rather than using constant values. The new SWAT model was verified in the Han River basin, China, and found its performance was much improved in comparison with that of the original SWAT model. Specifically, the accuracy of the leaf area index (LAI) simulation improved notably (coefficient of determination (R2) increased by 0.193, Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) increased by 0.846, and percent bias decreased by 42.18 %), and that of runoff simulation improved modestly (R2 increased by 0.05 and NSE was similar). Additionally, it is found that the original SWAT model substantially underestimated evapotranspiration (Penman-Monteith method) in comparison with the new SWAT model (65.09 mm (or 22.17 %) for forests, 92.27 mm (or 32 %) for orchards, and 96.16 mm (or 36.4 %) for farmland), primarily due to the inaccurate representation of LAI dynamics. Our results suggest that an accurate representation of phenological dates in the vegetation growth module is important for improving the SWAT model performance in terms of estimating terrestrial water and energy balance.

AB - The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model has been widely applied for simulating the water cycle and quantifying the influence of climate change and anthropogenic activities on hydrological processes. A major uncertainty of SWAT stems from the poor representation of vegetation dynamics due to the use of a simplistic vegetation growth and development module. Using long-term remote sensing-based phenological data, the SWAT model's vegetation module was improved by adding a dynamic growth start date and the dynamic heat requirement for vegetation growth rather than using constant values. The new SWAT model was verified in the Han River basin, China, and found its performance was much improved in comparison with that of the original SWAT model. Specifically, the accuracy of the leaf area index (LAI) simulation improved notably (coefficient of determination (R2) increased by 0.193, Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) increased by 0.846, and percent bias decreased by 42.18 %), and that of runoff simulation improved modestly (R2 increased by 0.05 and NSE was similar). Additionally, it is found that the original SWAT model substantially underestimated evapotranspiration (Penman-Monteith method) in comparison with the new SWAT model (65.09 mm (or 22.17 %) for forests, 92.27 mm (or 32 %) for orchards, and 96.16 mm (or 36.4 %) for farmland), primarily due to the inaccurate representation of LAI dynamics. Our results suggest that an accurate representation of phenological dates in the vegetation growth module is important for improving the SWAT model performance in terms of estimating terrestrial water and energy balance.

KW - LAI simulation

KW - Runoff

KW - SWAT modification

KW - Vegetation phenology

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128817

DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128817

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85145552821

VL - 616

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

M1 - 128817

ER -

ID: 332934904