Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention. / Kurth, Julia Katharina; Albrecht, Martin; Glaser, Karin; Karsten, Ulf; Vestergaard, Gisle; Armbruster, Martin; Kublik, Susanne; Schmid, Christoph A. O.; Schloter, Michael; Schulz, Stefanie.

In: Frontiers in Microbiology, Vol. 14, 1169958, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Kurth, JK, Albrecht, M, Glaser, K, Karsten, U, Vestergaard, G, Armbruster, M, Kublik, S, Schmid, CAO, Schloter, M & Schulz, S 2023, 'Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention', Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 14, 1169958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1169958

APA

Kurth, J. K., Albrecht, M., Glaser, K., Karsten, U., Vestergaard, G., Armbruster, M., Kublik, S., Schmid, C. A. O., Schloter, M., & Schulz, S. (2023). Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, [1169958]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1169958

Vancouver

Kurth JK, Albrecht M, Glaser K, Karsten U, Vestergaard G, Armbruster M et al. Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2023;14. 1169958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1169958

Author

Kurth, Julia Katharina ; Albrecht, Martin ; Glaser, Karin ; Karsten, Ulf ; Vestergaard, Gisle ; Armbruster, Martin ; Kublik, Susanne ; Schmid, Christoph A. O. ; Schloter, Michael ; Schulz, Stefanie. / Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention. In: Frontiers in Microbiology. 2023 ; Vol. 14.

Bibtex

@article{cec33f0e78684fd0a2cf5a8e2a36646b,
title = "Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention",
abstract = "Introduction: Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are known as biological hotspots on undisturbed, nutrient-poor bare soil surfaces and until now, are mostly observed in (semi-) arid regions but are currently poorly understood in agricultural systems. This is a crucial knowledge gap because managed sites of mesic regions can quickly cover large areas. Thus, we addressed the questions (i) if biocrusts from agricultural sites of mesic regions also increase nutrients and microbial biomass as their (semi-) arid counterparts, and (ii) how microbial community assemblage in those biocrusts is influenced by disturbances like different fertilization and tillage regimes.Methods: We compared phototrophic biomass, nutrient concentrations as well as the abundance, diversity and co-occurrence of Archaea, Bacteria, and Fungi in biocrusts and bare soils at a site with low agricultural soil quality.Results and Discussion: Biocrusts built up significant quantities of phototrophic and microbial biomass and stored more nutrients compared to bare soils independent of the fertilizer applied and the tillage management. Surprisingly, particularly low abundant Actinobacteria were highly connected in the networks of biocrusts. In contrast, Cyanobacteria were rarely connected, which indicates reduced importance within the microbial community of the biocrusts. However, in bare soil networks, Cyanobacteria were the most connected bacterial group and, hence, might play a role in early biocrust formation due to their ability to, e.g., fix nitrogen and thus induce hotspot-like properties. The microbial community composition differed and network complexity was reduced by conventional tillage. Mineral and organic fertilizers led to networks that are more complex with a higher percentage of positive correlations favoring microbe-microbe interactions. Our study demonstrates that biocrusts represent a microbial hotspot on soil surfaces under agricultural use, which may have important implications for sustainable management of such soils in the future.",
author = "Kurth, {Julia Katharina} and Martin Albrecht and Karin Glaser and Ulf Karsten and Gisle Vestergaard and Martin Armbruster and Susanne Kublik and Schmid, {Christoph A. O.} and Michael Schloter and Stefanie Schulz",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.3389/fmicb.2023.1169958",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Frontiers in Microbiology",
issn = "1664-302X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention

AU - Kurth, Julia Katharina

AU - Albrecht, Martin

AU - Glaser, Karin

AU - Karsten, Ulf

AU - Vestergaard, Gisle

AU - Armbruster, Martin

AU - Kublik, Susanne

AU - Schmid, Christoph A. O.

AU - Schloter, Michael

AU - Schulz, Stefanie

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Introduction: Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are known as biological hotspots on undisturbed, nutrient-poor bare soil surfaces and until now, are mostly observed in (semi-) arid regions but are currently poorly understood in agricultural systems. This is a crucial knowledge gap because managed sites of mesic regions can quickly cover large areas. Thus, we addressed the questions (i) if biocrusts from agricultural sites of mesic regions also increase nutrients and microbial biomass as their (semi-) arid counterparts, and (ii) how microbial community assemblage in those biocrusts is influenced by disturbances like different fertilization and tillage regimes.Methods: We compared phototrophic biomass, nutrient concentrations as well as the abundance, diversity and co-occurrence of Archaea, Bacteria, and Fungi in biocrusts and bare soils at a site with low agricultural soil quality.Results and Discussion: Biocrusts built up significant quantities of phototrophic and microbial biomass and stored more nutrients compared to bare soils independent of the fertilizer applied and the tillage management. Surprisingly, particularly low abundant Actinobacteria were highly connected in the networks of biocrusts. In contrast, Cyanobacteria were rarely connected, which indicates reduced importance within the microbial community of the biocrusts. However, in bare soil networks, Cyanobacteria were the most connected bacterial group and, hence, might play a role in early biocrust formation due to their ability to, e.g., fix nitrogen and thus induce hotspot-like properties. The microbial community composition differed and network complexity was reduced by conventional tillage. Mineral and organic fertilizers led to networks that are more complex with a higher percentage of positive correlations favoring microbe-microbe interactions. Our study demonstrates that biocrusts represent a microbial hotspot on soil surfaces under agricultural use, which may have important implications for sustainable management of such soils in the future.

AB - Introduction: Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are known as biological hotspots on undisturbed, nutrient-poor bare soil surfaces and until now, are mostly observed in (semi-) arid regions but are currently poorly understood in agricultural systems. This is a crucial knowledge gap because managed sites of mesic regions can quickly cover large areas. Thus, we addressed the questions (i) if biocrusts from agricultural sites of mesic regions also increase nutrients and microbial biomass as their (semi-) arid counterparts, and (ii) how microbial community assemblage in those biocrusts is influenced by disturbances like different fertilization and tillage regimes.Methods: We compared phototrophic biomass, nutrient concentrations as well as the abundance, diversity and co-occurrence of Archaea, Bacteria, and Fungi in biocrusts and bare soils at a site with low agricultural soil quality.Results and Discussion: Biocrusts built up significant quantities of phototrophic and microbial biomass and stored more nutrients compared to bare soils independent of the fertilizer applied and the tillage management. Surprisingly, particularly low abundant Actinobacteria were highly connected in the networks of biocrusts. In contrast, Cyanobacteria were rarely connected, which indicates reduced importance within the microbial community of the biocrusts. However, in bare soil networks, Cyanobacteria were the most connected bacterial group and, hence, might play a role in early biocrust formation due to their ability to, e.g., fix nitrogen and thus induce hotspot-like properties. The microbial community composition differed and network complexity was reduced by conventional tillage. Mineral and organic fertilizers led to networks that are more complex with a higher percentage of positive correlations favoring microbe-microbe interactions. Our study demonstrates that biocrusts represent a microbial hotspot on soil surfaces under agricultural use, which may have important implications for sustainable management of such soils in the future.

U2 - 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1169958

DO - 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1169958

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37520365

VL - 14

JO - Frontiers in Microbiology

JF - Frontiers in Microbiology

SN - 1664-302X

M1 - 1169958

ER -

ID: 362689190