Combining reverse osmosis and microbial degradation for remediation of drinking water contaminated with recalcitrant pesticide residue

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Combining reverse osmosis and microbial degradation for remediation of drinking water contaminated with recalcitrant pesticide residue. / Schostag, Morten D.; Gobbi, Alex; Fini, Mahdi Nikbakht; Ellegaard-Jensen, Lea; Aamand, Jens; Hansen, Lars Hestbjerg; Muff, Jens; Albers, Christian N.

In: Water Research, Vol. 216, 118352, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Schostag, MD, Gobbi, A, Fini, MN, Ellegaard-Jensen, L, Aamand, J, Hansen, LH, Muff, J & Albers, CN 2022, 'Combining reverse osmosis and microbial degradation for remediation of drinking water contaminated with recalcitrant pesticide residue', Water Research, vol. 216, 118352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118352

APA

Schostag, M. D., Gobbi, A., Fini, M. N., Ellegaard-Jensen, L., Aamand, J., Hansen, L. H., Muff, J., & Albers, C. N. (2022). Combining reverse osmosis and microbial degradation for remediation of drinking water contaminated with recalcitrant pesticide residue. Water Research, 216, [118352]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118352

Vancouver

Schostag MD, Gobbi A, Fini MN, Ellegaard-Jensen L, Aamand J, Hansen LH et al. Combining reverse osmosis and microbial degradation for remediation of drinking water contaminated with recalcitrant pesticide residue. Water Research. 2022;216. 118352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118352

Author

Schostag, Morten D. ; Gobbi, Alex ; Fini, Mahdi Nikbakht ; Ellegaard-Jensen, Lea ; Aamand, Jens ; Hansen, Lars Hestbjerg ; Muff, Jens ; Albers, Christian N. / Combining reverse osmosis and microbial degradation for remediation of drinking water contaminated with recalcitrant pesticide residue. In: Water Research. 2022 ; Vol. 216.

Bibtex

@article{a3d1d1411eda4845b861247a3fc7b56a,
title = "Combining reverse osmosis and microbial degradation for remediation of drinking water contaminated with recalcitrant pesticide residue",
abstract = "Groundwater contamination by recalcitrant organic micropollutants such as pesticide residues poses a great threat to the quality of drinking water. One way to remediate drinking water containing micropollutants is to bioaugment with specific pollutant degrading bacteria. Previous attempts to augment sand filters with the 2,6-dichlorobenzamide (BAM) degrading bacterium Aminobacter niigataensis MSH1 to remediate BAM-polluted drinking water initially worked well, but the efficiency rapidly decreased due to loss of degrader bacteria. Here, we use pilot-scale augmented sand filters to treat retentate of reverse osmosis treatment, thus increasing residence time in the biofilters and potentially nutrient availability. In a first pilot-scale experiment, BAM and most of the measured nutrients were concentrated 5–10 times in the retentate. This did not adversely affect the abundances of inoculated bacteria and the general prokaryotic community of the sand filter presented only minor differences. On the other hand, the high degradation activity was not prolonged compared to the filter receiving non-concentrated water at the same residence time. Using laboratory columns, it was shown that efficient BAM degradation could be achieved for >100 days by increasing the residence time in the sand filter. A slower flow may have practical implications for the treatment of large volumes of water, however this can be circumvented when treating only the retentate water equalling 10–15% of the volume of inlet water. We therefore conducted a second pilot-scale experiment with two inoculated sand filters receiving membrane retentate operated with different residence times (22 versus 133 min) for 65 days. While the number of MSH1 in the biofilters was not affected, the effect on degradation was significant. In the filter with short residence time, BAM degradation decreased from 86% to a stable level of 10–30% degradation within the first two weeks. The filter with the long residence time initially showed >97% BAM degradation, which only slightly decreased with time (88% at day 65). Our study demonstrates the advantage of combining membrane filtration with bioaugmented filters in cases where flow rate is of high importance.",
keywords = "Bacteria, Bioaugmentation, Biofilter, Membrane filtration, Micropollutants, Sand filter",
author = "Schostag, {Morten D.} and Alex Gobbi and Fini, {Mahdi Nikbakht} and Lea Ellegaard-Jensen and Jens Aamand and Hansen, {Lars Hestbjerg} and Jens Muff and Albers, {Christian N.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.watres.2022.118352",
language = "English",
volume = "216",
journal = "Water Research",
issn = "0043-1354",
publisher = "I W A Publishing",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combining reverse osmosis and microbial degradation for remediation of drinking water contaminated with recalcitrant pesticide residue

AU - Schostag, Morten D.

AU - Gobbi, Alex

AU - Fini, Mahdi Nikbakht

AU - Ellegaard-Jensen, Lea

AU - Aamand, Jens

AU - Hansen, Lars Hestbjerg

AU - Muff, Jens

AU - Albers, Christian N.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Groundwater contamination by recalcitrant organic micropollutants such as pesticide residues poses a great threat to the quality of drinking water. One way to remediate drinking water containing micropollutants is to bioaugment with specific pollutant degrading bacteria. Previous attempts to augment sand filters with the 2,6-dichlorobenzamide (BAM) degrading bacterium Aminobacter niigataensis MSH1 to remediate BAM-polluted drinking water initially worked well, but the efficiency rapidly decreased due to loss of degrader bacteria. Here, we use pilot-scale augmented sand filters to treat retentate of reverse osmosis treatment, thus increasing residence time in the biofilters and potentially nutrient availability. In a first pilot-scale experiment, BAM and most of the measured nutrients were concentrated 5–10 times in the retentate. This did not adversely affect the abundances of inoculated bacteria and the general prokaryotic community of the sand filter presented only minor differences. On the other hand, the high degradation activity was not prolonged compared to the filter receiving non-concentrated water at the same residence time. Using laboratory columns, it was shown that efficient BAM degradation could be achieved for >100 days by increasing the residence time in the sand filter. A slower flow may have practical implications for the treatment of large volumes of water, however this can be circumvented when treating only the retentate water equalling 10–15% of the volume of inlet water. We therefore conducted a second pilot-scale experiment with two inoculated sand filters receiving membrane retentate operated with different residence times (22 versus 133 min) for 65 days. While the number of MSH1 in the biofilters was not affected, the effect on degradation was significant. In the filter with short residence time, BAM degradation decreased from 86% to a stable level of 10–30% degradation within the first two weeks. The filter with the long residence time initially showed >97% BAM degradation, which only slightly decreased with time (88% at day 65). Our study demonstrates the advantage of combining membrane filtration with bioaugmented filters in cases where flow rate is of high importance.

AB - Groundwater contamination by recalcitrant organic micropollutants such as pesticide residues poses a great threat to the quality of drinking water. One way to remediate drinking water containing micropollutants is to bioaugment with specific pollutant degrading bacteria. Previous attempts to augment sand filters with the 2,6-dichlorobenzamide (BAM) degrading bacterium Aminobacter niigataensis MSH1 to remediate BAM-polluted drinking water initially worked well, but the efficiency rapidly decreased due to loss of degrader bacteria. Here, we use pilot-scale augmented sand filters to treat retentate of reverse osmosis treatment, thus increasing residence time in the biofilters and potentially nutrient availability. In a first pilot-scale experiment, BAM and most of the measured nutrients were concentrated 5–10 times in the retentate. This did not adversely affect the abundances of inoculated bacteria and the general prokaryotic community of the sand filter presented only minor differences. On the other hand, the high degradation activity was not prolonged compared to the filter receiving non-concentrated water at the same residence time. Using laboratory columns, it was shown that efficient BAM degradation could be achieved for >100 days by increasing the residence time in the sand filter. A slower flow may have practical implications for the treatment of large volumes of water, however this can be circumvented when treating only the retentate water equalling 10–15% of the volume of inlet water. We therefore conducted a second pilot-scale experiment with two inoculated sand filters receiving membrane retentate operated with different residence times (22 versus 133 min) for 65 days. While the number of MSH1 in the biofilters was not affected, the effect on degradation was significant. In the filter with short residence time, BAM degradation decreased from 86% to a stable level of 10–30% degradation within the first two weeks. The filter with the long residence time initially showed >97% BAM degradation, which only slightly decreased with time (88% at day 65). Our study demonstrates the advantage of combining membrane filtration with bioaugmented filters in cases where flow rate is of high importance.

KW - Bacteria

KW - Bioaugmentation

KW - Biofilter

KW - Membrane filtration

KW - Micropollutants

KW - Sand filter

U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118352

DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118352

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35358881

AN - SCOPUS:85127140026

VL - 216

JO - Water Research

JF - Water Research

SN - 0043-1354

M1 - 118352

ER -

ID: 307294213