The effect of short-term temperature exposure on vital physiological processes of mixoplankton and protozooplankton

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The effect of short-term temperature exposure on vital physiological processes of mixoplankton and protozooplankton. / Ferreira, Guilherme D.; Grigoropoulou, Afroditi; Saiz, Enric; Calbet, Albert.

In: Marine Environmental Research, Vol. 179, 105693, 07.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Ferreira, GD, Grigoropoulou, A, Saiz, E & Calbet, A 2022, 'The effect of short-term temperature exposure on vital physiological processes of mixoplankton and protozooplankton', Marine Environmental Research, vol. 179, 105693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105693

APA

Ferreira, G. D., Grigoropoulou, A., Saiz, E., & Calbet, A. (2022). The effect of short-term temperature exposure on vital physiological processes of mixoplankton and protozooplankton. Marine Environmental Research, 179, [105693]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105693

Vancouver

Ferreira GD, Grigoropoulou A, Saiz E, Calbet A. The effect of short-term temperature exposure on vital physiological processes of mixoplankton and protozooplankton. Marine Environmental Research. 2022 Jul;179. 105693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105693

Author

Ferreira, Guilherme D. ; Grigoropoulou, Afroditi ; Saiz, Enric ; Calbet, Albert. / The effect of short-term temperature exposure on vital physiological processes of mixoplankton and protozooplankton. In: Marine Environmental Research. 2022 ; Vol. 179.

Bibtex

@article{afc9c939835b4675a5ec060c9e6b00b3,
title = "The effect of short-term temperature exposure on vital physiological processes of mixoplankton and protozooplankton",
abstract = "Sudden environmental changes like marine heatwaves will become more intense and frequent in the future. Understanding the physiological responses of mixoplankton and protozooplankton, key members of marine food webs, to temperature is crucial. Here, we studied two dinoflagellates (one protozoo- and one mixoplanktonic), two ciliates (one protozoo- and one mixoplanktonic), and two cryptophytes. We report the acute (24 h) responses on growth and grazing to a range of temperatures (5–34 °C). We also determined respiration and photosynthetic rates for the four grazers within 6 °C of warming. The thermal performance curves showed that, in general, ciliates have higher optimal temperatures than dinoflagellates and that protozooplankton is better adapted to warming than mixoplankton. Our results confirmed that warmer temperatures decrease the cellular volumes of all species. Q10 coefficients suggest that grazing is the rate that increases the most in response to temperature in protozooplankton. Yet, in mixoplankton, grazing decreased in warmer temperatures, whereas photosynthesis increased. Therefore, we suggest that the Metabolic Theory of Ecology should reassess mixoplankton's position for the correct parameterisation of future climate change models. Future studies should also address the multigenerational response to temperature changes, to confirm whether mixoplankton become more phototrophic than phagotrophic in a warming scenario after adaptation.",
keywords = "Grazing, Growth, Mixoplankton, Mixotrophy, Protist, Temperature acclimation",
author = "Ferreira, {Guilherme D.} and Afroditi Grigoropoulou and Enric Saiz and Albert Calbet",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105693",
language = "English",
volume = "179",
journal = "Marine Environmental Research",
issn = "0141-1136",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of short-term temperature exposure on vital physiological processes of mixoplankton and protozooplankton

AU - Ferreira, Guilherme D.

AU - Grigoropoulou, Afroditi

AU - Saiz, Enric

AU - Calbet, Albert

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022/7

Y1 - 2022/7

N2 - Sudden environmental changes like marine heatwaves will become more intense and frequent in the future. Understanding the physiological responses of mixoplankton and protozooplankton, key members of marine food webs, to temperature is crucial. Here, we studied two dinoflagellates (one protozoo- and one mixoplanktonic), two ciliates (one protozoo- and one mixoplanktonic), and two cryptophytes. We report the acute (24 h) responses on growth and grazing to a range of temperatures (5–34 °C). We also determined respiration and photosynthetic rates for the four grazers within 6 °C of warming. The thermal performance curves showed that, in general, ciliates have higher optimal temperatures than dinoflagellates and that protozooplankton is better adapted to warming than mixoplankton. Our results confirmed that warmer temperatures decrease the cellular volumes of all species. Q10 coefficients suggest that grazing is the rate that increases the most in response to temperature in protozooplankton. Yet, in mixoplankton, grazing decreased in warmer temperatures, whereas photosynthesis increased. Therefore, we suggest that the Metabolic Theory of Ecology should reassess mixoplankton's position for the correct parameterisation of future climate change models. Future studies should also address the multigenerational response to temperature changes, to confirm whether mixoplankton become more phototrophic than phagotrophic in a warming scenario after adaptation.

AB - Sudden environmental changes like marine heatwaves will become more intense and frequent in the future. Understanding the physiological responses of mixoplankton and protozooplankton, key members of marine food webs, to temperature is crucial. Here, we studied two dinoflagellates (one protozoo- and one mixoplanktonic), two ciliates (one protozoo- and one mixoplanktonic), and two cryptophytes. We report the acute (24 h) responses on growth and grazing to a range of temperatures (5–34 °C). We also determined respiration and photosynthetic rates for the four grazers within 6 °C of warming. The thermal performance curves showed that, in general, ciliates have higher optimal temperatures than dinoflagellates and that protozooplankton is better adapted to warming than mixoplankton. Our results confirmed that warmer temperatures decrease the cellular volumes of all species. Q10 coefficients suggest that grazing is the rate that increases the most in response to temperature in protozooplankton. Yet, in mixoplankton, grazing decreased in warmer temperatures, whereas photosynthesis increased. Therefore, we suggest that the Metabolic Theory of Ecology should reassess mixoplankton's position for the correct parameterisation of future climate change models. Future studies should also address the multigenerational response to temperature changes, to confirm whether mixoplankton become more phototrophic than phagotrophic in a warming scenario after adaptation.

KW - Grazing

KW - Growth

KW - Mixoplankton

KW - Mixotrophy

KW - Protist

KW - Temperature acclimation

U2 - 10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105693

DO - 10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105693

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35803051

AN - SCOPUS:85133407538

VL - 179

JO - Marine Environmental Research

JF - Marine Environmental Research

SN - 0141-1136

M1 - 105693

ER -

ID: 316060544